Fluoride, PH Value, and Titratable Acidity of Commercially Available Mouthwashes

Overview

Journal Int Dent J

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2023 Oct 15

PMID 37839955

Authors

B W M van Swaaij

D E Slot

G A Van der Weijden

M F Timmerman

J Ruben

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aim: The primary objective of this work was to assess total soluble fluoride (TSF), pH values, and titratable acidity (TA) of various mouthwashes "in vitro," and the second was to compare fluoride content on labels with measured TSF.

Methods: Commercial mouthwashes were collected and analysed. Company, type, manufacturer data, and active ingredients (essential oils [EO], cetylpyridinium chloride [CPC], chlorhexidine [CHX], and fluoride) were described. TSF, pH, and TA capacity were measured. Descriptive quantitative analysis were performed per mouthwash.

Results: In total, 54 mouthwashes from 20 brands were included. These included mouthwashes with the active ingredients EO (n = 11), CPC (n = 17), CHX (n = 18), and fluoride (n = 32); 27 mouthwashes with more than 1 of these active ingredients; and 4 with none of the above-mentioned ingredients. Fluoride was present in different formulations; most contained sodium fluoride (NaF), and a few had sodium monofluorophosphate and amine fluoride + NaF. The pH values of all evaluated mouthwashes ranged from 4.1 to 7.9. Twenty mouthwashes presented pHs below 5.5, of which 10 contained fluoride. TA ranged from 0 to 48. According to the manufacturer data, mouthwashes with fluoride had concentrations from 217 to 450 ppm, with 90% in the range from 217 to 254 ppm. Laboratory data revealed that TSF ranged from 229 to 500 ppm, with 90% in the range from 229 to 337 ppm. A statistically significant difference was observed between measured TSF and the labelled fluoride content on the packaging of the fluoride mouthwashes (mean difference, 43.92 ± 34.34; P < .001). Most of these mouthwashes contained at least the amount of fluoride as mentioned on the packaging (93%).

Conclusion: The pH values and TA of commercially available mouthwashes showed a large variation. TSF levels of the fluoride mouthwashes were found to be at least the amount of fluoride as labelled. Dental care professionals should be aware of the pH, TA, fluoride content, and other active ingredients of different mouthwashes to better understand their potential impact on oral health.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the impact of acidic medications and fluoride-containing mouthwash on the enamel surface using quantitative light-induced fluorescence, microhardness, and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.

Bhasin S, Singh S, Thomas M, Mahabala K, Shenoy R BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):141.

PMID: 39871216 PMC: 11770972. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-025-05523-3.

Effect of different mouthwash solutions on the surface morphology, nanohardness and flexural modulus of nickel-titanium orthodontic wire.

Sawan N, Gassem A Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(9):2090-2095.

PMID: 39416640 PMC: 11476127. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.9.9428.

Effect of hydrogen peroxide versus charcoal-based whitening mouthwashes on color, surface roughness, and color stability of enamel.

Sultan M BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):897.

PMID: 39107715 PMC: 11302163. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04631-w.

References

Lee Y, Baek H, Choi Y, Jeong S, Park Y, Song K . Comparison of remineralization effect of three topical fluoride regimens on enamel initial carious lesions. J Dent. 2009; 38(2):166-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.10.002. View

Jafer M, Patil S, Hosmani J, Bhandi S, Chalisserry E, Anil S . Chemical Plaque Control Strategies in the Prevention of Biofilm-associated Oral Diseases. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17(4):337-43. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1851. View

Barbour M, Lussi A, Shellis R . Screening and prediction of erosive potential. Caries Res. 2011; 45 Suppl 1:24-32. DOI: 10.1159/000325917. View

Singh S, Jindal R . Evaluating the buffering capacity of various soft drinks, fruit juices and tea. J Conserv Dent. 2010; 13(3):129-31. PMC: 2980607. DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.71643. View

Venasakulchai A, Williams N, Gracia L, Rees G . A comparative evaluation of fluoridated and non-fluoridated mouthrinses using a 5-day cycling enamel erosion model. J Dent. 2011; 38 Suppl 3:S21-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(11)70005-7. View

Van der Weijden F, van der Sluijs E, Ciancio S, Slot D . Can Chemical Mouthwash Agents Achieve Plaque/Gingivitis Control?. Dent Clin North Am. 2015; 59(4):799-829. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2015.06.002. View

Larsen M, Nyvad B . Enamel erosion by some soft drinks and orange juices relative to their pH, buffering effect and contents of calcium phosphate. Caries Res. 1998; 33(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1159/000016499. View

Walsh T, Worthington H, Glenny A, Marinho V, Jeroncic A . Fluoride toothpastes of different concentrations for preventing dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 3:CD007868. PMC: 6398117. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007868.pub3. View

Lussi A, Jaeggi T . Chemical factors. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006; 20:77-87. DOI: 10.1159/000093353. View

10.

Gonzalez-Cabezas C, Jiang H, Fontana M, Eckert G . Effect of low pH on surface rehardening efficacy of high concentration fluoride treatments on non-cavitated lesions. J Dent. 2012; 40(6):522-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.03.002. View

11.

Cavalcanti A, Ramos I, Leite R, da Costa Oliveira M, de Melo Menezes K, Fernandes L . Endogenous pH, Titratable Acidity and Total Soluble Solid Content of Mouthwashes Available in the Brazilian Market. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4(2):156-9. PMC: 2853830. View

12.

Ganss C, Neutard L, von Hinckeldey J, Klimek J, Schlueter N . Efficacy of a tin/fluoride rinse: a randomized in situ trial on erosion. J Dent Res. 2010; 89(11):1214-8. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510375291. View

13.

Li X, Wang J, Joiner A, Chang J . The remineralisation of enamel: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2014; 42 Suppl 1:S12-20. DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(14)50003-6. View

14.

Aldrees A, AlBeshri S, AlSanie I, Alsarra I . Assessment of fluoride concentrations in commercially available mouthrinses in central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2014; 35(10):1278-82. PMC: 4362116. View

15.

Songsiripradubboon S, Hamba H, Trairatvorakul C, Tagami J . Sodium fluoride mouthrinse used twice daily increased incipient caries lesion remineralization in an in situ model. J Dent. 2014; 42(3):271-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.012. View

16.

Claffey N . Essential oil mouthwashes: a key component in oral health management. J Clin Periodontol. 2003; 30 Suppl 5:22-4. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.30.s5.8.x. View

17.

van Loveren C, Moorer W, Buijs M, van Palenstein Helderman W . Total and free fluoride in toothpastes from some non-established market economy countries. Caries Res. 2005; 39(3):224-30. DOI: 10.1159/000084802. View

18.

Larsson K, Stime A, Hansen L, Birkhed D, Ericson D . Salivary fluoride concentration and retention after rinsing with 0.05 and 0.2% sodium fluoride (NaF) compared with a new high F rinse containing 0.32% NaF. Acta Odontol Scand. 2020; 78(8):609-613. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1800085. View

19.

Valadas L, Sorazabal A, Salgado P, Argentieri A, Squassi A . Fluoride concentration in dentifrices marketed In Argentina. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021; 21(1):157-164. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12570. View

20.

Levine R . Fluoride in toothpaste - is the expressed total fluoride content meaningful for caries prevention?. Br Dent J. 2020; 228(10):795-799. DOI: 10.1038/s41415-020-1540-8. View