» Articles » PMID: 37839561

Subclinical Keratoconus Detection and Characterization Using Motion-Tracking Brillouin Microscopy

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2023 Oct 15
PMID 37839561
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To characterize focal biomechanical alterations in subclinical keratoconus (SKC) using motion-tracking (MT) Brillouin microscopy and evaluate the ability of MT Brillouin metrics to differentiate eyes with SKC from normal control eyes.

Design: Prospective cross-sectional study.

Participants: Thirty eyes from 30 patients were evaluated, including 15 eyes from 15 bilaterally normal patients and 15 eyes with SKC from 15 patients.

Methods: All patients underwent Scheimpflug tomography and MT Brillouin microscopy using a custom-built device. Mean and minimum MT Brillouin values within the anterior plateau region and anterior 150 μm were generated. Scheimpflug metrics evaluated included inferior-superior (IS) value, maximum keratometry (K), thinnest corneal thickness, asymmetry indices, Belin/Ambrosio display total deviation, and Ambrosio relational thickness. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated for all Scheimpflug and MT Brillouin metrics evaluated to determine the area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity for each variable.

Main Outcome Measures: Discriminative performance based on AUC, sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: No significant differences were found between groups for age, sex, manifest refraction spherical equivalent, corrected distance visual acuity, K, or KISA% index. Among Scheimpflug metrics, significant differences were found between groups for thinnest corneal thickness (556 μm vs. 522 μm; P < 0.001), IS value (0.29 diopter [D] vs. 1.05 D; P < 0.001), index of vertical asymmetry (IVA; 0.10 vs. 0.19; P < 0.001), and keratoconus index (1.01 vs. 1.05; P < 0.001), and no significant differences were found for any other Scheimpflug metric. Among MT Brillouin metrics, clear differences were found between control eyes and eyes with SKC for mean plateau (5.71 GHz vs. 5.68 GHz; P < 0.0001), minimum plateau (5.69 GHz vs. 5.65 GHz; P < 0.0001), mean anterior 150 μm (5.72 GHz vs. 5.68 GHz; P < 0.0001), and minimum anterior 150 μm (5.70 GHz vs. 5.66 GHz; P < 0.001). All MT Brillouin plateau and anterior 150 μm mean and minimum metrics fully differentiated groups (AUC, 1.0 for each), whereas the best performing Scheimpflug metrics were keratoconus index (AUC, 0.91), IS value (AUC, 0.89), and IVA (AUC, 0.88).

Conclusions: Motion-tracking Brillouin microscopy metrics effectively characterize focal corneal biomechanical alterations in eyes with SKC and clearly differentiated these eyes from control eyes, including eyes that were not differentiated accurately using Scheimpflug metrics.

Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Citing Articles

Strategies for Early Keratoconus Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Evaluating Affordable and Effective Detection Techniques.

Gideon Abou Said A, Gispets J, Shneor E J Clin Med. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39860468 PMC: 11765535. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020460.


Consensus Statement on Brillouin Light Scattering Microscopy of Biological Materials.

Bouvet P, Bevilacqua C, Ambekar Y, Antonacci G, Au J, Caponi S ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39606723 PMC: 11601801.


Brillouin microscopy.

Kabakova I, Zhang J, Xiang Y, Caponi S, Bilenca A, Guck J Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2024; 4.

PMID: 39391288 PMC: 11465583. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-023-00286-z.


Comparison of a Scheimpflug imaging with other screening indices in diagnosing keratoconus and keratoconus suspect.

Huo Y, Xie R, Chen X, Li S, Zou H, Liu Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):23187.

PMID: 39369097 PMC: 11455890. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-74497-z.


The Utilization of Brillouin Microscopy in Corneal Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.

Loveless B, Moin K, Hoopes P, Moshirfar M Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e65769.

PMID: 39211657 PMC: 11361473. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65769.


References
1.
Randleman J, Dawson D, Grossniklaus H, McCarey B, Edelhauser H . Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008; 24(1):S85-9. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20080101-15. View

2.
Donoso R, Rodriguez A, Esteffan K, Lagos C, Aranguiz D, Hernandez N . Analysis of OPD-Scan and Pentacam Parameters for Early Keratoconus Detection. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021; 226:235-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.012. View

3.
Hwang E, Perez-Straziota C, Kim S, Santhiago M, Randleman J . Distinguishing Highly Asymmetric Keratoconus Eyes Using Combined Scheimpflug and Spectral-Domain OCT Analysis. Ophthalmology. 2018; 125(12):1862-1871. PMC: 6246819. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.06.020. View

4.
Herber R, Hasanli A, Lenk J, Vinciguerra R, Terai N, Pillunat L . Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Indices in Distinguishing Between Normal, Very Asymmetric, and Bilateral Keratoconic Eyes. J Refract Surg. 2022; 38(6):364-372. DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20220601-01. View

5.
Andreassen T, Simonsen A, Oxlund H . Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp Eye Res. 1980; 31(4):435-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-4835(80)80027-3. View