» Articles » PMID: 37835968

Virtual Design of 3D-Printed Bone Tissue Engineered Scaffold Shape Using Mechanobiological Modeling: Relationship of Scaffold Pore Architecture to Bone Tissue Formation

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Oct 14
PMID 37835968
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large bone defects are clinically challenging, with up to 15% of these requiring surgical intervention due to non-union. Bone grafts (autographs or allografts) can be used but they have many limitations, meaning that polymer-based bone tissue engineered scaffolds (tissue engineering) are a more promising solution. Clinical translation of scaffolds is still limited but this could be improved by exploring the whole design space using virtual tools such as mechanobiological modeling. In tissue engineering, a significant research effort has been expended on materials and manufacturing but relatively little has been focused on shape. Most scaffolds use regular pore architecture throughout, leaving custom or irregular pore architecture designs unexplored. The aim of this paper is to introduce a virtual design environment for scaffold development and to illustrate its potential by exploring the relationship of pore architecture to bone tissue formation. A virtual design framework has been created utilizing a mechanical stress finite element (FE) model coupled with a cell behavior agent-based model to investigate the mechanobiological relationships of scaffold shape and bone tissue formation. A case study showed that modifying pore architecture from regular to irregular enabled between 17 and 33% more bone formation within the 4-16-week time periods analyzed. This work shows that shape, specifically pore architecture, is as important as other design parameters such as material and manufacturing for improving the function of bone tissue scaffold implants. It is recommended that future research be conducted to both optimize irregular pore architectures and to explore the potential extension of the concept of shape modification beyond mechanical stress to look at other factors present in the body.

Citing Articles

Biocomposite Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering: Materials, Fabrication Techniques and Future Directions.

Sultana N, Cole A, Strachan F Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(22).

PMID: 39597399 PMC: 11595283. DOI: 10.3390/ma17225577.


A Multidisciplinary Evaluation of Three-Dimensional Polycaprolactone Bioactive Glass Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Purposes.

Marchiori G, Bellucci D, Gambardella A, Petretta M, Berni M, Boi M Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(10).

PMID: 38793481 PMC: 11122918. DOI: 10.3390/ma17102413.


Design, Manufacture, and Characterization of a Critical-Sized Gradient Porosity Dual-Material Tibial Defect Scaffold.

Lee M, Pan C, Chen W, Lin M, Shiue Y Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(4).

PMID: 38671730 PMC: 11047886. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040308.

References
1.
Vo T, Kasper F, Mikos A . Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012; 64(12):1292-309. PMC: 3358582. DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016. View

2.
Wagoner Johnson A, Herschler B . A review of the mechanical behavior of CaP and CaP/polymer composites for applications in bone replacement and repair. Acta Biomater. 2010; 7(1):16-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.012. View

3.
Postigo S, Schmidt H, Rohlmann A, Putzier M, Simon A, Duda G . Investigation of different cage designs and mechano-regulation algorithms in the lumbar interbody fusion process - a finite element analysis. J Biomech. 2014; 47(6):1514-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.005. View

4.
Balimane P, Chong S . Cell culture-based models for intestinal permeability: a critique. Drug Discov Today. 2005; 10(5):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03354-9. View

5.
Maliha S, Lopez C, Coelho P, Witek L, Cox M, Meskin A . Bone Tissue Engineering in the Growing Calvaria Using Dipyridamole-Coated, Three-Dimensionally-Printed Bioceramic Scaffolds: Construct Optimization and Effects on Cranial Suture Patency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020; 145(2):337e-347e. PMC: 7212767. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006483. View