» Articles » PMID: 37831325

Advancing Subcutaneous Dosing Regimens for Biotherapeutics: Clinical Strategies for Expedited Market Access

Overview
Journal BioDrugs
Date 2023 Oct 13
PMID 37831325
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In recent years, subcutaneous administration of biotherapeutics has made significant progress. The self-administration market for rheumatoid arthritis has witnessed the introduction of additional follow-on biologics, while the first subcutaneous dosing options for monoclonal antibodies have become available for multiple sclerosis. Oncology has also seen advancements with the authorization of high-volume subcutaneous formulations, facilitated by the development of high-concentration formulations and innovative delivery systems. Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment bodies increasingly consider preference data in filing dossiers, particularly in evaluating novel drug delivery methods. The adoption of a pharmacokinetic-based clinical bridging approach has become standard for transitioning from intravenous to subcutaneous administration. Non-inferiority studies with pharmacokinetics as the only primary endpoint have started deviating from traditional randomization schemes, favoring the subcutaneous route and comparing with historical intravenous data. While nonclinical and computational models made progress in predicting safety and immunogenicity for subcutaneously dosed antibodies, clinical trial evidence remains essential due to inter-individual variations and the impact of formulation parameters on anti-drug antibody formation. Ongoing technological advancements and the expanding knowledge base on pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlation across specialty areas are expected to further accelerate clinical development of subcutaneous biologics.

Citing Articles

Stick With Intravenous or Give Subcutaneous a Shot? Time and Other Considerations When Evaluating Cancer Drug Formulations.

Gupta A, Tregear M, Pace M, Vogel R JCO Oncol Pract. 2024; 21(3):267-269.

PMID: 39094070 PMC: 11787399. DOI: 10.1200/OP-24-00501.


Subcutaneous delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors: new route replacing intravenous administration?.

Inoue Y Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2024; 13(4):947-951.

PMID: 38736492 PMC: 11082710. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-24-63.

References
1.
Bittner B, Richter W, Schmidt J . Subcutaneous Administration of Biotherapeutics: An Overview of Current Challenges and Opportunities. BioDrugs. 2018; 32(5):425-440. PMC: 6182494. DOI: 10.1007/s40259-018-0295-0. View

2.
McCreary E, Bariola J, Wadas R, Shovel J, Wisniewski M, Adam M . Association of Subcutaneous or Intravenous Administration of Casirivimab and Imdevimab Monoclonal Antibodies With Clinical Outcomes in Adults With COVID-19. JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(4):e226920. PMC: 9006104. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6920. View

3.
Bittner B . Drug delivery improvements to enable a flexible care setting for monoclonal antibody medications in oncology - Analogue-based decision framework. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2023; 20(4):457-470. DOI: 10.1080/17425247.2023.2184343. View

4.
Bittner B . Customer-centric product presentations for monoclonal antibodies. AAPS Open. 2023; 9(1):3. PMC: 9869842. DOI: 10.1186/s41120-022-00069-y. View

5.
OShaughnessy J, Sousa S, Cruz J, Fallowfield L, Auvinen P, Pulido C . Preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study. Eur J Cancer. 2021; 152:223-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.047. View