» Articles » PMID: 37830146

Assessment of Vestigial Auriculomotor Activity to Acoustic Stimuli Using Electrodes In and Around the Ear

Overview
Journal Trends Hear
Date 2023 Oct 13
PMID 37830146
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, it has been demonstrated that electromyographic (EMG) activity of auricular muscles in humans, especially the postauricular muscle (PAM), depends on the spatial location of auditory stimuli. This observation has only been shown using wet electrodes placed directly on auricular muscles. To move towards a more applied, out-of-the-laboratory setting, this study aims to investigate if similar results can be obtained using electrodes placed in custom-fitted earpieces. Furthermore, with the exception of the ground electrode, only dry-contact electrodes were used to record EMG signals, which require little to no skin preparation and can therefore be applied extremely fast. In two experiments, auditory stimuli were presented to ten participants from different spatial directions. In experiment 1, stimuli were rapid onset naturalistic stimuli presented in silence, and in experiment 2, the corresponding participant's first name, presented in a "cocktail party" environment. In both experiments, ipsilateral responses were significantly larger than contralateral responses. Furthermore, machine learning models objectively decoded the direction of stimuli significantly above chance level on a single trial basis (PAM: 80%, in-ear: 69%). There were no significant differences when participants repeated the experiments after several weeks. This study provides evidence that auricular muscle responses can be recorded reliably using an almost entirely dry-contact in-ear electrode system. The location of the PAM, and the fact that in-ear electrodes can record comparable signals, would make hearing aids interesting devices to record these auricular EMG signals and potentially utilize them as control signals in the future.

Citing Articles

Electromyographic correlates of effortful listening in the vestigial auriculomotor system.

Schroeer A, Corona-Strauss F, Hannemann R, Hackley S, Strauss D Front Neurosci. 2025; 18:1462507.

PMID: 39959575 PMC: 11825814. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1462507.


Artificial Intelligence in Audiology: A Scoping Review of Current Applications and Future Directions.

Frosolini A, Franz L, Caragli V, Genovese E, de Filippis C, Marioni G Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(22).

PMID: 39598904 PMC: 11598364. DOI: 10.3390/s24227126.

References
1.
Gruters K, Murphy D, Jenson C, Smith D, Shera C, Groh J . The eardrums move when the eyes move: A multisensory effect on the mechanics of hearing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018; 115(6):E1309-E1318. PMC: 5819440. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717948115. View

2.
Kappel S, Kidmose P . Real-Life Dry-Contact Ear-EEG. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018; 2018:5470-5474. DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513532. View

3.
Debener S, Emkes R, De Vos M, Bleichner M . Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:16743. PMC: 4648079. DOI: 10.1038/srep16743. View

4.
Valentin O, Viallet G, Delnavaz A, Cretot-Richert G, Ducharme M, Monsarat-Chanon H . Custom-Fitted In- and Around-the-Ear Sensors for Unobtrusive and On-the-Go EEG Acquisitions: Development and Validation. Sensors (Basel). 2021; 21(9). PMC: 8122839. DOI: 10.3390/s21092953. View

5.
Norton J, Lee D, Lee J, Lee W, Kwon O, Won P . Soft, curved electrode systems capable of integration on the auricle as a persistent brain-computer interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112(13):3920-5. PMC: 4386388. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1424875112. View