» Articles » PMID: 37829774

Quantitative Assessment of Ultrasound-guided Sciatic Nerve Block - A Comparison of a Single-point Versus Two-point Injection Technique: A Randomised Controlled, Double-blinded Trial

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2023 Oct 13
PMID 37829774
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Aims: Sciatic nerve block at the popliteal level for lower limb procedures provides unpredictable success rates even with ultrasonographic (USG) guidance. This study aimed to compare USG-guided single-point versus two-point injection techniques

Methods: Sixty patients posted for foot surgeries under USG-guided sciatic nerve block were randomised into Group Single Point, receiving a single injection of 20 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline just proximal to the sciatic nerve bifurcation, and Group Double Point, receiving two injections of 10 mL of 1.5% lignocaine with adrenaline, one at the point similar to the first group and a second injection 6 cm above the first point. Sensory blockade onset, time to complete sensory blockade, time to complete motor blockade, length of the nerve exposed and analgesia duration were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistics version 20 software.

Results: Double-point injection technique showed a significantly faster time to complete motor blockade [14.46 (9.93) min], increased length of nerve exposed to local anaesthetic [23.23 (7.209) cm] and extended duration of analgesia [420.40 (99.34) min] compared to the single-point injection technique [20.89 (12.62) min, 18.78 (5.95) cm and 344.28 (125.97) min, respectively]. The onset of sensory blockade and the time to complete sensory blockade were comparable between the two groups.

Conclusion: USG-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block with a double-point injection technique does not significantly shorten the time to complete the sensory block. However, the time to complete motor nerve block and duration of analgesia are prolonged significantly, which may be clinically beneficial for postoperative analgesia.

References
1.
White L, Bright M, Velli G, Boon M, Thang C . Efficacy and safety of proximal popliteal sciatic nerve block compared with distal sciatic bifurcation or selective tibial and peroneal nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2022; 129(6):e158-e162. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.08.025. View

2.
Reina M, Sala-Blanch X, Monzo E, Nin O, Bigeleisen P, Boezaart A . Extrafasicular and Intraperineural, but No Endoneural, Spread after Deliberate Intraneural Injections in a Cadaveric Study. Anesthesiology. 2019; 130(6):1007-1016. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002647. View

3.
Cappelleri G, Cedrati V, Fedele L, Gemma M, Camici L, Loiero M . Effects of the Intraneural and Subparaneural Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Clinical and Electrophysiological Comparison. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016; 41(4):430-7. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000413. View

4.
Raymond S, Steffensen S, Gugino L, Strichartz G . The role of length of nerve exposed to local anesthetics in impulse blocking action. Anesth Analg. 1989; 68(5):563-70. View

5.
Reina M, Boezaart A, Sala-Blanch X, Monzo E, Tubbs R, Server A . A novel marker for identifying and studying the membranes, barriers, and compartments surrounding peripheral nerves microscopically. Clin Anat. 2018; 31(7):1050-1057. DOI: 10.1002/ca.23253. View