» Articles » PMID: 37829114

Effects of High-intensity Interval Training on Lean Mass, Strength, and Power of the Lower Limbs in Healthy Old and Young People

Abstract

Whether high-intensity interval training (HIIT) can improve lean mass, strength, and power of the lower limbs in young and older people is still under discussion. This study aimed to determine the effect of HIIT on lean mass, maximal strength, rate of force development (RFD), and muscle power of both lower limbs in healthy young and older adults. Secondarily, to compare the effects of HIIT between dominant vs. non-dominant lower limbs of each group. Healthy older ( = 9; 66 ± 6 years; BMI 27.1 ± 3.1 kg m) and young ( = 9; 21 ± 1 years; BMI 26.2 ± 2.8 kg m) men underwent 12 weeks of HIIT (3x/week) on a stationary bicycle. The evaluations were made before and after the HIIT program by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), anthropometry, force transducer and, Sit-to-Stand test. The outcomes analyzed were limb lean mass, thigh circumference, maximal voluntary isometric strength, RFD (Time intervals: 0-50, 50-100, 100-200, and 0-200 ms), and muscle power in both lower limbs. After 12 weeks of HIIT, non-dominant limb (NDL) showed increase in limb lean mass ( < 0.05) but without interaction (time*group). HIIT showed a gain in absolute maximal strength and also when adjusted for thigh circumference in the dominant lower limb (DL) in both groups. The RFD showed differences between groups but without interaction. The RFD of the NDL showed post-training improvements ( < 0.05) in both groups. Only the older group showed differences between DL vs. NDL in most of the RFD obtained post-intervention. In addition, post-HIIT muscle power gain was observed in both groups ( < 0.05), but mainly in older adults. HIIT promotes increases in lean mass, maximal strength, early RFD, and lower limb muscle power in healthy older and young individuals. The differences shown between the DL and the NDL must be analyzed in future studies.

Citing Articles

Evaluating the Effects of an Enhanced Strength Training Program in Remote Cardiological Rehabilitation: A Shift from Aerobic Dominance-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Nabutovsky I, Sabah R, Moreno M, Epstein Y, Klempfner R, Scheinowitz M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592308 PMC: 10934934. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051445.


Importance of upper and lower body resistance exercise for preventing and reversing sarcopenia in Parkinson's disease.

Corcos D Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2024; 123:106104.

PMID: 38555266 PMC: 11167200. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.106104.

References
1.
Clark D, Pojednic R, Reid K, Patten C, Pasha E, Phillips E . Longitudinal decline of neuromuscular activation and power in healthy older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013; 68(11):1419-25. PMC: 3805299. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt036. View

2.
Mitchell W, Williams J, Atherton P, Larvin M, Lund J, Narici M . Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and the impact of advancing age on human skeletal muscle size and strength; a quantitative review. Front Physiol. 2012; 3:260. PMC: 3429036. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2012.00260. View

3.
Lomborg S, Dalgas U, Hvid L . The importance of neuromuscular rate of force development for physical function in aging and common neurodegenerative disorders - a systematic review. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2022; 22(4):562-586. PMC: 9716292. View

4.
Venturelli M, Reggiani C, Schena F . Beyond the current knowledge on sarcopenia: new insight on neuromuscular factors. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2022; 34(5):1183-1185. PMC: 9135861. DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02082-3. View

5.
Cruz-Jentoft A, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyere O, Cederholm T . Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2018; 48(1):16-31. PMC: 6322506. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afy169. View