» Articles » PMID: 37828565

Effectiveness of the Booster Dose of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine Against Omicron BA.5 Infection: a Matched Cohort Study of Adult Close Contacts

Overview
Journal Respir Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2023 Oct 12
PMID 37828565
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although COVID-19 vaccines and their booster regimens protect against symptomatic infections and severe outcomes, there is limited evidence about their protection against asymptomatic and symptomatic infections in real-world settings, particularly when considering that the majority of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infections were asymptomatic. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of the booster dose of inactivated vaccines in mainland China, i.e., Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) and Sinovac (CoronaVac), against Omicron infection in an Omicron BA.5 seeded epidemic.

Methods: Based on an infection-naive but highly vaccinated population in Urumqi, China, the study cohort comprised all 37,628 adults who had a contact history with individuals having SARS-CoV-2 infections, i.e., close contacts, between August 1 and September 7, 2022. To actively detect SARS-CoV-2 infections, RT-PCR tests were performed by local authorities on a daily basis for all close contacts, and a testing-positive status was considered a laboratory-confirmed outcome. The cohort of close contacts was matched at a ratio of 1:5 with the fully vaccinated (i.e., 2 doses) and booster vaccinated groups (i.e., 3 doses) according to sex, age strata, calendar date, and contact settings. Multivariate conditional logistic regression models were adopted to estimate the marginal effectiveness of the booster dose against Omicron BA.5 infection after adjusting for confounding variables. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) in different strata of sex, age, the time lag from the last vaccine dose to exposure, and the vaccination status of the source case. Kaplan-Meier curves were employed to visualize the follow-up process and testing outcomes among different subgroups of the matched cohort.

Findings: Before matching, 37,099 adult close contacts were eligible for cohort enrolment. After matching, the 2-dose and 3-dose groups included 3317 and 16,051 contacts, and the proportions with Omicron infections were 1.03% and 0.62% among contacts in the 2-dose and 3-dose groups, respectively. We estimated that the adjusted effectiveness of the inactivated booster vaccine versus 2 doses against Omicron infection was 35.5% (95% CI 2.0, 57.5). The booster dose provided a higher level of protection, with an effectiveness of 60.2% (95% CI 22.8, 79.5) for 15-180 days after vaccination, but this VE decreased to 35.0% (95% CI 2.8, 56.5) after 180 days. Evidence for the protection of the booster dose was detected among young adults aged 18-39 years, but was not detected for those aged 40 years or older.

Interpretation: The receipt of the inactivated vaccine booster dose was associated with a significantly lower Omicron infection risk, and our findings confirmed the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of booster doses against Omicron BA.5 variants. Given the rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2, we highlight the importance of continuously monitoring the protective performance of vaccines against the genetic variants of SARS-CoV-2, regardless of existing vaccine coverage.

Citing Articles

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) after severe/critical COVID-19 or COVID-19 vaccination.

Bahrami S, Ansari B, Norouzi-Barough L, Bagherpour B, Khorvash F, Shirani K Eur J Med Res. 2025; 30(1):131.

PMID: 39994747 PMC: 11849160. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-02378-w.


Comparing the protection of heterologous booster of inhaled Ad5-nCoV vaccine and hybrid immunity against Omicron BA.5 infection: a cohort study of hospital staff in China.

Wang K, Zeng T, Guo Z, Liang J, Sun S, Ni Y BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):1401.

PMID: 39695978 PMC: 11654266. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-10250-1.


COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness Studies against Symptomatic and Severe Outcomes during the Omicron Period in Four Countries in the Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Runge M, Karimian Z, Kheirandish M, Borghi G, Wodniak N, Fahmy K Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39204033 PMC: 11360574. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12080906.


An inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine based on a Vero cell culture-adapted high-titer virus confers cross-protection in small animals.

Offersgaard A, Duarte Hernandez C, Zhou Y, Duan Z, Gammeltoft K, Hartmann K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17039.

PMID: 39048693 PMC: 11269720. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67570-0.


Assessing the dynamics and impact of COVID-19 vaccination on disease spread: A data-driven approach.

Waseel F, Streftaris G, Rudrusamy B, Dass S Infect Dis Model. 2024; 9(2):527-556.

PMID: 38525308 PMC: 10958481. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2024.02.010.


References
1.
Hodgson S, Mansatta K, Mallett G, Harris V, Emary K, Pollard A . What defines an efficacious COVID-19 vaccine? A review of the challenges assessing the clinical efficacy of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020; 21(2):e26-e35. PMC: 7837315. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30773-8. View

2.
Dagotto G, Yu J, Barouch D . Approaches and Challenges in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Development. Cell Host Microbe. 2020; 28(3):364-370. PMC: 7416703. DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.002. View

3.
Dai L, Gao G . Viral targets for vaccines against COVID-19. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020; 21(2):73-82. PMC: 7747004. DOI: 10.1038/s41577-020-00480-0. View

4.
Rennert L, Ma Z, McMahan C, Dean D . Effectiveness and protection duration of Covid-19 vaccines and previous infection against any SARS-CoV-2 infection in young adults. Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):3946. PMC: 9263799. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31469-z. View

5.
Tartof S, Slezak J, Fischer H, Hong V, Ackerson B, Ranasinghe O . Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2021; 398(10309):1407-1416. PMC: 8489881. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02183-8. View