» Articles » PMID: 37823295

New Complementary Alternatives in Third Molar Autotransplantation: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Oct 12
PMID 37823295
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Dental autotransplantation (DAT) is defined as the replacement or direct transfer of an impacted, semi-impacted or erupted tooth to a donor site, either to a post-extraction socket or to a surgically created socket within the same individual. The use of new technological advances, such as 3-D dental models based on computer-aided design, among others, have been reported to improve the success rate of DAT. Therefore, we aimed to perform a systematic review to explore the possible benefits that the use of these innovative techniques can provide when applied to DAT.

Material And Methods: The literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases following the PRISMA guidelines. The research question was: "Are computerized technological advancements a useful tool for improving the success of third molar autotransplantation technique?

Results: The initial literature search identified 195 articles, of which only 11 were included for qualitative analysis. All studies used 3D dental models based on computer-aided design data. Surgical guides and stereolithographic models were used by 4 and 1 study respectively. A total of 91 transplanted teeth were evaluated, out of which only 88 were considered within the parameters of clinical success (96.7%). Only 7 out of the 11 articles reported the specific autotransplanted tooth, being mandibular third molars the most prevalent autotransplanted teeth.

Conclusions: Although the application of new technologies for DAT increases the success rate of this technique, further primary studies are still needed to address long-term teeth survival rates and complications. The cost and availability to implement the integration of these techniques to DAT may be a variable to consider, as this can be a limitation for some patients or for low-income countries.

Citing Articles

Autotransplantation of immature second premolar combined with alveolar ridge splitting: A long-term (6-year) follow-up case report.

Feng C, Pan Y, Chen L, Wang J, Shi Z, Wu Y Aust Endod J. 2024; 50(3):693-699.

PMID: 39494977 PMC: 11636166. DOI: 10.1111/aej.12886.

References
1.
Bassir S, El Kholy K, Chen C, Lee K, Intini G . Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2018; 90(5):493-506. PMC: 6500770. DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0338. View

2.
Abella Sans F, Ribas F, Doria G, Roig M, Duran-Sindreu F . Guided tooth autotransplantation in edentulous areas post-orthodontic treatment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021; 33(5):685-691. DOI: 10.1111/jerd.12786. View

3.
Mena-Alvarez J, Riad-Deglow E, Quispe-Lopez N, Rico-Romano C, Zubizarreta-Macho A . Technology at the service of surgery in a new technique of autotransplantation by guided surgery: a case report. BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):99. PMC: 7140495. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-01095-6. View

4.
Kim K, Choi H, Pang N . Clinical application of 3D technology for tooth autotransplantation: A case report. Aust Endod J. 2018; 45(1):122-128. DOI: 10.1111/aej.12260. View

5.
Sugai T, Yoshizawa M, Kobayashi T, Ono K, Takagi R, Kitamura N . Clinical study on prognostic factors for autotransplantation of teeth with complete root formation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 39(12):1193-203. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2010.06.018. View