» Articles » PMID: 37822577

Assessing the Impact of Recovery Housing on Healthcare Utilization in Portland, Oregon

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Oct 12
PMID 37822577
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Central City Concern (CCC) operates several recovery housing sites in the Portland, Oregon metropolitan region, including the Blackburn Center (Blackburn) and the Richard L. Harris Building (Harris). This retrospective, observational study was designed to assess recovery housing's impact on inpatient detoxification readmission rates and healthcare utilization patterns.

Methods: Our study population consisted of individuals discharged from CCC's Hooper Detox Stabilization Center from June 2019 to September 2020. A total of 75 clients housed at Blackburn, 63 clients housed at Harris, and 57 clients discharged as unhoused were included in the study sample. Using logistic regression for each of the two recovery housing groups relative to the unhoused group, we examined differences in readmissions to inpatient detoxification after their qualifying discharge. We then used Difference-In-Difference model to compare the per member per year (PMPY) use of different domains of health care before and after their qualifying discharge.

Results: Compared to clients discharged as unhoused, Blackburn and Harris residents had lower risk of readmissions to inpatient detoxification treatment at 90- and 180-days post-discharge. Additionally, while the mean number of PMPY emergency department visits increased for clients discharged as unhoused in the post period, the average number of emergency department visits decreased for clients who obtained recovery housing at Blackburn (DiD=-3.65 PMPY, p-value=0.02) and at Harris (DiD=-3.87 PMPY, p-value=0.01).

Conclusion: Findings highlight the impact and importance of recovery housing for individuals managing a substance use disorder and the value of healthcare system and public sector investment housing like Blackburn and Harris.

Citing Articles

Housing assistance among people who are unstably housed and use drugs in Oregon: a cross-sectional study.

Chung E, Wenger L, Good D, Leichtling G, Godvin M, Lambdin B BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):740.

PMID: 39988688 PMC: 11847344. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21925-y.

References
1.
Shaham Y, Shalev U, Lu L, de Wit H, Stewart J . The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002; 168(1-2):3-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-002-1224-x. View

2.
Vanderplasschen W, Colpaert K, Autrique M, Rapp R, Pearce S, Broekaert E . Therapeutic communities for addictions: a review of their effectiveness from a recovery-oriented perspective. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:427817. PMC: 3562581. DOI: 10.1155/2013/427817. View

3.
Mericle A, Polcin D, Hemberg J, Miles J . Recovery Housing: Evolving Models to Address Resident Needs. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2017; 49(4):352-361. PMC: 5998815. DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2017.1342154. View

4.
Stergiopoulos V, Mejia-Lancheros C, Nisenbaum R, Wang R, Lachaud J, OCampo P . Long-term effects of rent supplements and mental health support services on housing and health outcomes of homeless adults with mental illness: extension study of the At Home/Chez Soi randomised controlled trial. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019; 6(11):915-925. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30371-2. View

5.
Running Bear U, Hanson J, Noonan C, Muller C, Trojan J, Manson S . Factors associated with readmission to alcohol and opioid detoxification in the Alaska Interior. Am J Addict. 2022; 31(5):406-414. PMC: 9463080. DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13288. View