» Articles » PMID: 37821808

Redefining Serological Diagnostics with Immunoaffinity Proteomics

Overview
Journal Clin Proteomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2023 Oct 11
PMID 37821808
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Serological diagnostics is generally defined as the detection of specific human immunoglobulins developed against viral, bacterial, or parasitic diseases. Serological tests facilitate the detection of past infections, evaluate immune status, and provide prognostic information. Serological assays were traditionally implemented as indirect immunoassays, and their design has not changed for decades. The advantages of straightforward setup and manufacturing, analytical sensitivity and specificity, affordability, and high-throughput measurements were accompanied by limitations such as semi-quantitative measurements, lack of universal reference standards, potential cross-reactivity, and challenges with multiplexing the complete panel of human immunoglobulin isotypes and subclasses. Redesign of conventional serological tests to include multiplex quantification of immunoglobulin isotypes and subclasses, utilize universal reference standards, and minimize cross-reactivity and non-specific binding will facilitate the development of assays with higher diagnostic specificity. Improved serological assays with higher diagnostic specificity will enable screenings of asymptomatic populations and may provide earlier detection of infectious diseases, autoimmune disorders, and cancer. In this review, we present the major clinical needs for serological diagnostics, overview conventional immunoassay detection techniques, present the emerging immunoassay detection technologies, and discuss in detail the advantages and limitations of mass spectrometry and immunoaffinity proteomics for serological diagnostics. Finally, we explore the design of novel immunoaffinity-proteomic assays to evaluate cell-mediated immunity and advance the sequencing of clinically relevant immunoglobulins.

Citing Articles

A Careful Insight into DDI-Type Receptor Layers on the Way to Improvement of Click-Biology-Based Immunosensors.

Karon S, Drozd M, Malinowska E Biosensors (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38534243 PMC: 10968432. DOI: 10.3390/bios14030136.

References
1.
Croft N, Purcell A, Tscharke D . Quantifying epitope presentation using mass spectrometry. Mol Immunol. 2015; 68(2 Pt A):77-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.06.010. View

2.
Silman A, Pearson J . Epidemiology and genetics of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. 2002; 4 Suppl 3:S265-72. PMC: 3240153. DOI: 10.1186/ar578. View

3.
Toh B, Chan J, Kyaw T, Alderuccio F . Cutting edge issues in autoimmune gastritis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2010; 42(3):269-78. DOI: 10.1007/s12016-010-8218-y. View

4.
Jones S, Finnegan K, Wee J, DArgoeuves P, Roalfe L, Byrne S . Assignment of Serotype-Specific IgG1, IgG2, and IgA Weight-Based Antibody Units to the Human Pneumococcal Standard Reference Serum, 007sp. mSphere. 2019; 4(3). PMC: 6584377. DOI: 10.1128/mSphere.00400-19. View

5.
Barbonetti A, Castellini C, DAndrea S, Cordeschi G, Santucci R, Francavilla S . Prevalence of anti-sperm antibodies and relationship of degree of sperm auto-immunization to semen parameters and post-coital test outcome: a retrospective analysis of over 10 000 men. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(5):834-841. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez030. View