Sensory Changes in the Ocular Surface After Pterygium Removal

Overview

Journal Clin Ophthalmol

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2023 Oct 11

PMID 37818286

Authors

Saleh Esa

Ori Segal

Arie Y Nemet

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: We measure changes in ocular surface sensation after pterygium surgery with a conjunctival autograft.

Methods: This prospective, interventional study was carried out in patients, with nasal primary pterygium undergoing pterygium surgery with conjunctival autograft. Sensation was measured by applying the tip of the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer filament perpendicular to the ocular surface in the cornea and conjunctiva. Patients were tested preoperatively (baseline), and at 2 weeks, 2 and 4 months, postoperatively.

Results: Nineteen eyes of 18 patients completed the 4-month follow-up. Mean age was 61±10.1 (range 36-76) years. Corneal sensation returned to normal values in all at 2 and at 4 months. The central cornea was significantly more sensitive compared to the average of the four peripheral measurements pre- (59.2 mm vs 48.3 mm, p=0.000) and postoperatively (59.2 mm vs 48.4 mm, p=0.000). Conjunctival sensation was reduced significantly 2 months postoperatively in the inferior region (p=0.04). Four months postoperatively, it was more sensitive in the superior area (13.9 mm vs 17.1 mm, p=0.01) and the inferior area (13.7 mm vs 19.5 mm, p=0.003). In each matching area, the cornea was significantly more sensitive than the conjunctiva pre- and postoperatively (p=0.00). Sensation was not significantly different between the sexes or age groups.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the presence of inferior and superior conjunctival hyperesthesia at conjunctival autograft sites after pterygium surgery. The healing process, sensory input, tear film instability and epitheliopathy of the ocular surface are possible explanations for these novel findings.

References

Viso E, Gude F, Rodriguez-Ares M . Prevalence of pinguecula and pterygium in a general population in Spain. Eye (Lond). 2010; 25(3):350-7. PMC: 3178324. DOI: 10.1038/eye.2010.204. View

Belmonte C . Eye dryness sensations after refractive surgery: impaired tear secretion or "phantom" cornea?. J Refract Surg. 2007; 23(6):598-602. DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20070601-11. View

Kaminski S, Biowski R, Lukas J, Koyuncu D, Grabner G . Corneal sensitivity 10 years after epikeratoplasty. J Refract Surg. 2002; 18(6):731-6. DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20021101-11. View

Twelker J, Bailey I, Mannis M, Satariano W . Evaluating pterygium severity: a survey of corneal specialists. Cornea. 2000; 19(3):292-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200005000-00007. View

Zander E, WEDDELL G . Observations on the innervation of the cornea. J Anat. 1951; 85(1):68-99. PMC: 1273614. View

Kim W, Kim J . Change in corneal sensitivity following laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999; 25(3):368-73. DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)80085-6. View

Ishioka M, Shimmura S, Yagi Y, Tsubota K . Pterygium and dry eye. Ophthalmologica. 2001; 215(3):209-11. DOI: 10.1159/000050860. View

Zhao Z, Zhang J, Liang H, Zhang S, Shao C, Fan X . Corneal Reinnervation and Sensitivity Recovery after Pterygium Excision. J Ophthalmol. 2020; 2020:1349072. PMC: 7057010. DOI: 10.1155/2020/1349072. View

Muller L, Marfurt C, Kruse F, Tervo T . Corneal nerves: structure, contents and function. Exp Eye Res. 2003; 76(5):521-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00050-2. View

10.

Situ P, Simpson T, Fonn D, Jones L . Conjunctival and corneal pneumatic sensitivity is associated with signs and symptoms of ocular dryness. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49(7):2971-6. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1734. View

11.

Black E, Gladstone G, Nesi F . Eyelid sensation after supratarsal lid crease incision. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002; 18(1):45-9. DOI: 10.1097/00002341-200201000-00007. View

12.

Saw S, Banerjee K, Tan D . Risk factors for the development of pterygium in Singapore: a hospital-based case-control study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000; 78(2):216-20. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002216.x. View

13.

Jiang J, Yang Y, Zhang M, Fu X, Bao X, Yao K . Comparison of fibrin sealant and sutures for conjunctival autograft fixation in pterygium surgery: one-year follow-up. Ophthalmologica. 2008; 222(2):105-11. DOI: 10.1159/000112627. View

14.

Jaros P, Deluise V . Pingueculae and pterygia. Surv Ophthalmol. 1988; 33(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1016/0039-6257(88)90071-9. View

15.

Hirst L . The treatment of pterygium. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003; 48(2):145-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00463-0. View

16.

Pan H, Zhong J, Jing C . Comparison of fibrin glue versus suture for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2011; 118(6):1049-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.10.033. View

17.

Lyne A . Corneal sensitivity after surgery. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K (1962). 1982; 102 (pt 2):302-5. View

18.

Millodot M . Objective measurement of corneal sensitivity. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1973; 51(3):325-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1973.tb06010.x. View

19.

Schimmelpfennig B . Nerve structures in human central corneal epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1982; 218(1):14-20. DOI: 10.1007/BF02134093. View

20.

Gazzard G, Saw S, Farook M, Koh D, Widjaja D, Chia S . Pterygium in Indonesia: prevalence, severity and risk factors. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002; 86(12):1341-6. PMC: 1771435. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.86.12.1341. View