» Articles » PMID: 37818148

Audiological Tests Used in the Evaluation of the Effects of Solvents on the Human Auditory System: A Mixed Methods Review

Overview
Journal Semin Hear
Date 2023 Oct 11
PMID 37818148
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to scope the literature, identify knowledge gaps, appraise results, and synthesize the evidence on the audiological evaluation of workers exposed to solvents. We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and NIOSHTIC-2 up to March 22, 2021. Using Covidence, two authors independently assessed study eligibility, risk of bias, and extracted data. National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tools was used in the quality evaluation of included studies; the Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the risk of bias. Of 454 located references, 37 were included. Twenty-five tests were studied: two tests to measure hearing thresholds, one test to measure word recognition in quiet, six electroacoustic procedures, four electrophysiological tests, and twelve behavioral tests to assess auditory processing skills. Two studies used the Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap. The quality of individual studies was mostly considered moderate, but the overall quality of evidence was considered low. The discrepancies between studies and differences in the methodologies/outcomes prevent recommending a specific test battery to assess the auditory effects of occupational solvents. Decisions on audiological tests for patients with a history of solvent exposures require the integration of the most current research evidence with clinical expertise and stakeholder perspectives.

Citing Articles

Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss: 50 Years of Research and Recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Themann C, Masterson E, Peterson J, Murphy W Semin Hear. 2023; 44(4):351-393.

PMID: 37818146 PMC: 10562059. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769499.


Audiological findings of family farmers exposed to pesticides.

Lobato D, Alcaras P, Franca D, de Oliveira Goncalves C, Fuente A, de Lacerda A Codas. 2023; 35(4):e20220108.

PMID: 37672475 PMC: 10546921. DOI: 10.1590/2317-1782/20232022108pt.

References
1.
Hormozi M, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mirzaei R, Dehghan Haghighi J, Eftekharian F . The risk of hearing loss associated with occupational exposure to organic solvents mixture with and without concurrent noise exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2017; 30(4):521-535. DOI: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01024. View

2.
Downs S, Black N . The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52(6):377-84. PMC: 1756728. DOI: 10.1136/jech.52.6.377. View

3.
Yu K, Choi C, An Y, Kwak M, Gong S, Yoon S . Comparison of the effectiveness of monitoring Cisplatin-induced ototoxicity with extended high-frequency pure-tone audiometry or distortion-product otoacoustic emission. Korean J Audiol. 2014; 18(2):58-68. PMC: 4181054. DOI: 10.7874/kja.2014.18.2.58. View

4.
Fuente A, McPherson B . Central auditory damage induced by solvent exposure. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2007; 13(4):391-7. DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2007.11105096. View

5.
Johnson A, Morata T, Lindblad A, Nylen P, Svensson E, Krieg E . Audiological findings in workers exposed to styrene alone or in concert with noise. Noise Health. 2007; 8(30):45-57. DOI: 10.4103/1463-1741.32467. View