» Articles » PMID: 37817998

Suppression of Sweet Taste-related Responses by Plant-derived Bioactive Compounds and Eating. Part I: A Systematic Review in Humans

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Oct 11
PMID 37817998
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The taste of food plays a crucial role in determining what and how much we eat. Thus, interventions that temporarily block sweet taste receptors offer a promising approach to addressing unhealthy behaviours associated with sugary foods. However, the relationship between reduced sweet taste response and food consumption remains unclear, with contradictory findings. Certain studies suggest that a diminished perception of sweetness leads to a sense of fullness and results in reduced food intake, while others suggest the opposite effect. To shed some light, our systematic review looked into the relationship between diminished sweet taste response and food consumption by examining the effects of bioactive compounds that experimentally inhibit sweetness in healthy individuals. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews and conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, and covered original papers included in Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Food Science Source and Food Science and technology abstracts. We identified 33 peer-reviewed English-language studies that fit the topic and met the inclusion criteria. The current literature predominantly focuses on the immediate impact of oral gymnemic acids, failing to provide preliminary evidence in support of the specific threshold hypothesis, above which food consumption decreases and below which the opposite effect occurs. Additionally, there was inconsistency in the findings regarding the short-term desire to eat following sweetness inhibition. Considering the downstream effects on energy intake and their clinical applications, further research is needed to clarify both the acute within-session effects (i.e., not wanting any more now) and the longer-term effects (i.e., deciding not to start eating) linked to oral sweet-taste-suppressing compounds.

References
1.
Yoshikawa K, Nagai Y, Yoshida M, Arihara S . Antisweet natural products. VIII. Structures of hodulosides VI--X from Hovenia dulcis Thunb. var. tomentella Makino. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo). 1993; 41(10):1722-5. DOI: 10.1248/cpb.41.1722. View

2.
Bartoshuk L, Duffy V, Hayes J, Moskowitz H, Snyder D . Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006; 361(1471):1137-48. PMC: 1642698. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1853. View

3.
Kashima H, Eguchi K, Miyamoto K, Fujimoto M, Yamaoka Endo M, Aso-Someya N . Suppression of Oral Sweet Taste Sensation with Gymnema sylvestre Affects Postprandial Gastrointestinal Blood Flow and Gastric Emptying in Humans. Chem Senses. 2017; 42(4):295-302. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjw126. View

4.
Gaspar P, Bessa F, Antunes Meireles P, Parreira I, Mota C . Sweet Taste Dysgeusia in a Patient with Indapamide-Related Hyponatremia: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cureus. 2021; 13(2):e13079. PMC: 7931776. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13079. View

5.
Ventura A, Mennella J . Innate and learned preferences for sweet taste during childhood. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2011; 14(4):379-84. DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328346df65. View