Visual Functions, Seatbelt Usage, Speed, and Alcohol Consumption Standards for Driving and Their Impact on Road Traffic Accidents

Overview

Journal Clin Optom (Auckl)

Publisher Dove Medical Press

Date 2023 Oct 10

PMID 37814654

Authors

Hessa Almatar

Suhailah Alamri

Reema Alduhayan

Balsam Alabdulkader

Bayan Albdah

Amritha Stalin

Barrak Alsomaie

Ahmed Almazroa

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of road traffic accidents (RTAs) is dramatically increasing worldwide. Consequently, driving and licensing authorities have instituted strict rules and regulations, such as vision standards, restrictions on drunk driving, seat belt usage, and speeding, for driving safety. This study aimed to summarize the global visual standards for driving license issuing and renewal and investigate the effect of driving safety laws on RTA-related death rates in different countries.

Methods: The study gathered data on visual standards for driving licenses from reliable sources and extracted enforcement scores (drunk driving, seat belt usage, and speeding) and RTA-related death rates from the World Health Organization status report on road safety. The Wilcoxon test explored the association between visual standards and RTA-related death rates, while the Kruskal-Wallis test analyzed the relationship between visual functions and death rates, as well as driving safety enforcement scores and RTA-related death rates.

Results: The analysis was conducted on 71 countries and 50 states within the United States out of the 193 countries listed by the United Nations. It was found that 116 countries and states required a minimum VA range of 6/6-6/18, while 91 countries and states mandated a similar range for one-eyed drivers. VF testing for driving licenses was necessary in 77 countries and states. No significant association was observed between VA or VF testing and RTA-related death rates. However, countries that conducted more visual function tests demonstrated lower rates of RTA-related fatalities. Furthermore, RTA-related death rates were significantly associated with speeding, drunk driving, and seat belt laws.

Conclusion: Implementing clear policies regarding vision requirements, maintaining strict rules, and promoting law enforcement on speeding, drunk driving, and seat belt usage are crucial for improving road safety. These measures should be prioritized by driving and licensing authorities worldwide to mitigate the escalating incidence of RTAs.

Citing Articles

Could Automated Objective Measurements Acquired at the Preoperative Stage Estimate the Corrected Distance Visual Acuity after Corneal Cross-Linking in Keratoconus?.

Gilevska F, Biscevic A, Bohac M, Patel S Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(10):2599-2614.

PMID: 39110318 PMC: 11408454. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00993-0.

References

Owsley C, Stalvey B, Wells J, Sloane M, McGwin Jr G . Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(6):881-7. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.6.881. View

Anstey K, Wood J, Lord S, Walker J . Cognitive, sensory and physical factors enabling driving safety in older adults. Clin Psychol Rev. 2004; 25(1):45-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2004.07.008. View

Abbas A, Hefny A, Abu-Zidan F . Seatbelts and road traffic collision injuries. World J Emerg Surg. 2011; 6(1):18. PMC: 3121590. DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-6-18. View

Sharifi A, Sharifi H, Karamouzian M, Daneshtalab E, Daneshtalab A . Visual fitness of public vehicle drivers in southeast of iran. Int J Prev Med. 2013; 4(6):705-9. PMC: 3733039. View

Johnson C, Casson E . Effects of luminance, contrast, and blur on visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci. 1995; 72(12):864-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199512000-00004. View

Bro T, Lindblom B . Strain out a gnat and swallow a camel? - vision and driving in the Nordic countries. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018; 96(6):623-630. DOI: 10.1111/aos.13741. View

Owsley C, McGwin Jr G . Vision impairment and driving. Surv Ophthalmol. 1999; 43(6):535-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6257(99)00035-1. View

Yan M, Kumar H, Kerr N, Medeiros F, Sandhu S, Crowston J . Transnational review of visual standards for driving: How Australia compares with the rest of the world. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019; 47(7):847-863. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13572. View

McGwin Jr G, Xie A, Mays A, Joiner W, DeCarlo D, Hall T . Visual field defects and the risk of motor vehicle collisions among patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 46(12):4437-41. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0750. View

10.

Decina L, Staplin L . Retrospective evaluation of alternative vision screening criteria for older and younger drivers. Accid Anal Prev. 1993; 25(3):267-75. DOI: 10.1016/0001-4575(93)90021-n. View

11.

Papalimperi A, Athanaselis S, Mina A, Papoutsis I, Spiliopoulou C, Papadodima S . Incidence of fatalities of road traffic accidents associated with alcohol consumption and the use of psychoactive drugs: A 7-year survey (2011-2017). Exp Ther Med. 2019; 18(3):2299-2306. PMC: 6676144. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2019.7787. View

12.

Steinkuller P . Legal vision requirements for drivers in the United States. Virtual Mentor. 2012; 12(12):938-40. DOI: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2010.12.12.hlaw1-1012. View

13.

Fell J, Voas R . The effectiveness of reducing illegal blood alcohol concentration (BAC) limits for driving: evidence for lowering the limit to .05 BAC. J Safety Res. 2006; 37(3):233-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2005.07.006. View

14.

Mock C, Gloyd S, Adjei S, Acheampong F, Gish O . Economic consequences of injury and resulting family coping strategies in Ghana. Accid Anal Prev. 2002; 35(1):81-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(01)00092-6. View

15.

Haliza A, Md Muziman Syah M, Norliza M . Visual problems of new malaysian drivers. Malays Fam Physician. 2015; 5(2):95-8. PMC: 4170403. View

16.

Bron A, Viswanathan A, Thelen U, De Natale R, Ferreras A, Gundgaard J . International vision requirements for driver licensing and disability pensions: using a milestone approach in characterization of progressive eye disease. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010; 4:1361-9. PMC: 2999549. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S15359. View

17.

Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

18.

Johnson C, Keltner J . Incidence of visual field loss in 20,000 eyes and its relationship to driving performance. Arch Ophthalmol. 1983; 101(3):371-5. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1983.01040010371002. View

19.

Adeoti C, Ubah J, Isawumi M, Ashaye A, Oluwatimilehin I, Raji R . Visual standards in commercial driving. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2007; 14(3):199-203. View

20.

Blake R, SLOANE M, Fox R . Further developments in binocular summation. Percept Psychophys. 1981; 30(3):266-76. DOI: 10.3758/bf03214282. View