» Articles » PMID: 37812296

Multi-parametric MRI-based Machine Learning Model for Prediction of WHO Grading in Patients with Meningiomas

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Oct 9
PMID 37812296
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a nomogram combined multiparametric MRI and clinical indicators for identifying the WHO grade of meningioma.

Materials And Methods: Five hundred and sixty-eight patients were included in this study, who were diagnosed pathologically as having meningiomas. Firstly, radiomics features were extracted from CE-T1, T2, and 1-cm-thick tumor-to-brain interface (BTI) images. Then, difference analysis and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were orderly used to select the most representative features. Next, the support vector machine algorithm was conducted to predict the WHO grade of meningioma. Furthermore, a nomogram incorporated radiomics features and valuable clinical indicators was constructed by logistic regression. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by calibration and clinical effectiveness, as well as internal validation.

Results: Peritumoral edema volume and gender are independent risk factors for predicting meningioma grade. The multiparametric MRI features incorporating CE-T1, T2, and BTI features showed the higher performance for prediction of meningioma grade with a pooled AUC = 0.885 (95% CI, 0.821-0.946) and 0.860 (95% CI, 0.788-0.923) in the training and test groups, respectively. Then, a nomogram with a pooled AUC = 0.912 (95% CI, 0.876-0.961), combined radiomics score, peritumoral edema volume, and gender improved diagnostic performance compared to radiomics model or clinical model and showed good calibration as the true results. Moreover, decision curve analysis demonstrated satisfactory clinical effectiveness of the proposed nomogram.

Conclusions: A novel nomogram is simple yet effective in differentiating WHO grades of meningioma and thus can be used in patients with meningiomas.

Clinical Relevance Statement: We proposed a nomogram that included clinical indicators and multi-parameter radiomics features, which can accurately, objectively, and non-invasively differentiate WHO grading of meningioma and thus can be used in clinical work.

Key Points: • The study combined radiomics features and clinical indicators for objectively predicting the meningioma grade. • The model with CE-T1 + T2 + brain-to-tumor interface features demonstrated the best predictive performance by investigating seven different radiomics models. • The nomogram potentially has clinical applications in distinguishing high-grade and low-grade meningiomas.

Citing Articles

Performance of Radiomics-based machine learning and deep learning-based methods in the prediction of tumor grade in meningioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tavanaei R, Akhlaghpasand M, Alikhani A, Hajikarimloo B, Ansari A, Yong R Neurosurg Rev. 2025; 48(1):78.

PMID: 39849257 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-025-03236-3.


Correlation of Edema/Tumor Index With Histopathological Outcomes According to the WHO Classification of Cranial Tumors.

Reyes Soto G, Vega-Moreno D, Catillo-Rangel C, Gonzalez-Aguilar A, Chavez-Martinez O, Nikolenko V Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e72942.

PMID: 39634980 PMC: 11614750. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72942.


Multi-parameter MRI radiomics model in predicting postoperative progressive cerebral edema and hemorrhage after resection of meningioma.

Hu K, Tan G, Liao X, Liu W, Han W, Hu L Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):149.

PMID: 39487466 PMC: 11529156. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00796-3.


ChatGPT as an effective tool for quality evaluation of radiomics research.

Mese I, Kocak B Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39406959 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11122-7.


Multi-parametric MRI-based machine learning model for prediction of pathological grade of renal injury in a rat kidney cold ischemia-reperfusion injury model.

Chen L, Ren Y, Yuan Y, Xu J, Wen B, Xie S BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):188.

PMID: 39060984 PMC: 11282691. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01320-6.


References
1.
Louis D, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat D, Cree I, Figarella-Branger D . The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23(8):1231-1251. PMC: 8328013. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106. View

2.
Yan P, Yan L, Hu T, Xiao D, Zhang Z, Zhao H . The Potential Value of Preoperative MRI Texture and Shape Analysis in Grading Meningiomas: A Preliminary Investigation. Transl Oncol. 2017; 10(4):570-577. PMC: 5487245. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.04.006. View

3.
Moliterno J, Cope W, Vartanian E, Reiner A, Kellen R, Ogilvie S . Survival in patients treated for anaplastic meningioma. J Neurosurg. 2015; 123(1):23-30. DOI: 10.3171/2014.10.JNS14502. View

4.
Rosenberg L, Prayson R, Lee J, Reddy C, Chao S, Barnett G . Long-term experience with World Health Organization grade III (malignant) meningiomas at a single institution. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74(2):427-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.08.018. View

5.
Zhao Z, Xiao D, Nie C, Zhang H, Jiang X, Jecha A . Development of a Nomogram Based on Preoperative Bi-Parametric MRI and Blood Indices for the Differentiation Between Cystic-Solid Pituitary Adenoma and Craniopharyngioma. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:709321. PMC: 8300562. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.709321. View