» Articles » PMID: 37809656

In Vitro Determination of the Protein Quality of Maize Varieties Cultivated in Malawi Using the INFOGEST Digestion Method

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Oct 9
PMID 37809656
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is an urgent need to alleviate protein deficiencies in low-income countries where cereal-based diets dominate. The objective of this study was to use the INFOGEST static digestion method and a recently established analytical workflow to determine the in vitro amino acid digestibility and protein quality of seven maize varieties grown in Malawi. Protein quality was measured using the in vitro digestible indispensable amino acid score (DIAAS). Amino acid digestibility was higher for the dehulled, low fibre, provitamin A maize flour (66%), compared to whole grain maize flours (51-61%), suggesting that the presence of fibre reduced digestibility (p < 0.05). Lysine was the limiting amino acid in all varieties, with the following DIAAS values for each variety; Provitamin A maize - 24, SC 719 - 32, Mtsikinya - 37, SC 167 - 39, Quality protein maize (QPM) - 40, Bantum - 40, SC 403 - 44. In addition to the variety of maize, protein quality was dependent on the level of processing and the agronomic practice applied with higher protein quality for the SC 403 variety in which zinc enriched fertilizer was applied. Comparing protein quality data with published in vivo data showed that DIAAS data were in closer agreement than amino acid digestibility data, which was slightly lower than published values, with mean in vitro amino acid digestibilities of 56-70% compared to a mean in vivo value of 77%. Overall, the in vitro method was able to correctly predict both the direction and magnitude of response. The INFOGEST digestion method coupled with the new analytical workflow will therefore be useful in the screening of high protein cereal crops and subsequent development of cereal-based foods with high protein quality.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Technological and Sensory Properties, Digestibility, and Bioactive Compounds in from Different Maize Genotypes.

Bongianino N, Steffolani M, Rodriguez M, Bustos M, Biasutti C, Leon A Foods. 2024; 13(4).

PMID: 38397566 PMC: 10888072. DOI: 10.3390/foods13040590.

References
1.
Muleya M, Tang K, Broadley M, Salter A, Joy E . Limited Supply of Protein and Lysine Is Prevalent among the Poorest Households in Malawi and Exacerbated by Low Protein Quality. Nutrients. 2022; 14(12). PMC: 9230964. DOI: 10.3390/nu14122430. View

2.
Nuss E, Tanumihardjo S . Quality protein maize for Africa: closing the protein inadequacy gap in vulnerable populations. Adv Nutr. 2012; 2(3):217-24. PMC: 3090170. DOI: 10.3945/an.110.000182. View

3.
Fufa H, Akalu G, Wondimu A, Taffesse S, Gebre T, Schlosser K . Assessment of protein nutritional quality and effects of traditional processes: a comparison between Ethiopian quality protein maize and five Ethiopian adapted normal maize cultivars. Nahrung. 2003; 47(4):269-73. DOI: 10.1002/food.200390063. View

4.
Plascencia A, Bermudez R, Cervantes M, Corona L, Davila-Ramos H, Lopez-Soto M . Influence of processing method on comparative digestion of white corn versus conventional steam-flaked yellow dent corn in finishing diets for feedlot cattle. J Anim Sci. 2010; 89(1):136-41. DOI: 10.2527/jas.2010-3116. View

5.
Brodkorb A, Egger L, Alminger M, Alvito P, Assuncao R, Ballance S . INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal food digestion. Nat Protoc. 2019; 14(4):991-1014. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-018-0119-1. View