» Articles » PMID: 37809321

Challenges and Directions in Analytical Paleobiology

Abstract

Over the last 50 years, access to new data and analytical tools has expanded the study of analytical paleobiology, contributing to innovative analyses of biodiversity dynamics over Earth's history. Despite-or even spurred by-this growing availability of resources, analytical paleobiology faces deep-rooted obstacles that stem from the need for more equitable access to data and best practices to guide analyses of the fossil record. Recent progress has been accelerated by a collective push toward more collaborative, interdisciplinary, and open science, especially by early-career researchers. Here, we survey four challenges facing analytical paleobiology from an early-career perspective: (1) accounting for biases when interpreting the fossil record; (2) integrating fossil and modern biodiversity data; (3) building data science skills; and (4) increasing data accessibility and equity. We discuss recent efforts to address each challenge, highlight persisting barriers, and identify tools that have advanced analytical work. Given the inherent linkages between these challenges, we encourage discourse across disciplines to find common solutions. We also affirm the need for systemic changes that reevaluate how we conduct and share paleobiological research.

Citing Articles

Museum 'dark data' show variable impacts on deep-time biogeographic and evolutionary history.

Dean C, Thompson J Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2041):20242481.

PMID: 39999885 PMC: 11858742. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.2481.


Advancing terrestrial ecology by improving cross-temporal research and collaboration.

Azevedo-Schmidt L, Landrum M, Spoth M, Brocchini N, Hamley K, Mereghetti A Bioscience. 2025; 75(1):15-29.

PMID: 39911156 PMC: 11791528. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biae108.


Forecasting sea otter recolonization: insights from isotopic analysis of modern and zooarchaeological populations.

Elliott Smith E, Moss M, Wellman H, Gill V, Monson D, Newsome S Proc Biol Sci. 2025; 292(2039):20241682.

PMID: 39876720 PMC: 11775623. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1682.


Ten simple rules to bridge ecology and palaeoecology by publishing outside palaeoecological journals.

Schafstall N, Benito X, Brugger S, Davies A, Ellis E, Pla-Rabes S PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(10):e1012487.

PMID: 39405317 PMC: 11573137. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012487.


Late Cretaceous ammonoids show that drivers of diversification are regionally heterogeneous.

Flannery-Sutherland J, Crossan C, Myers C, Hendy A, Landman N, Witts J Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5382.

PMID: 38937471 PMC: 11211348. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49462-z.

References
1.
Amano T, Sutherland W . Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security. Proc Biol Sci. 2013; 280(1756):20122649. PMC: 3574366. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2649. View

2.
Chiarenza A, Mannion P, Lunt D, Farnsworth A, Jones L, Kelland S . Ecological niche modelling does not support climatically-driven dinosaur diversity decline before the Cretaceous/Paleogene mass extinction. Nat Commun. 2019; 10(1):1091. PMC: 6403247. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08997-2. View

3.
Brewer S, Jackson S, Williams J . Paleoecoinformatics: applying geohistorical data to ecological questions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2011; 27(2):104-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2011.09.009. View

4.
Szabo P, Hedl R . Advancing the integration of history and ecology for conservation. Conserv Biol. 2011; 25(4):680-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01710.x. View

5.
Heberling J, Miller J, Noesgaard D, Weingart S, Schigel D . Data integration enables global biodiversity synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(6). PMC: 8017944. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2018093118. View