» Articles » PMID: 37808526

In-stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Emerging Knowledge on Biological Pathways

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 9
PMID 37808526
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has evolved significantly over the past four decades. Since its inception, in-stent restenosis (ISR)-the progressive reduction in vessel lumen diameter after PCI-has emerged as the main complication of the procedure. Although the incidence of ISR has reduced from 30% at 6 months with bare-metal stents to 7% at 4 years with drug-eluting stents (DESs), its occurrence is relevant in absolute terms because of the dimensions of the population treated with PCI. The aim of this review is to summarize the emerging understanding of the biological pathways that underlie ISR. In-stent restenosis is associated with several factors, including patient-related, genetic, anatomic, stent, lesion, and procedural characteristics. Regardless of associated factors, there are common pathophysiological pathways involving molecular phenomena triggered by the mechanical trauma caused by PCI. Such biological pathways are responses to the denudation of the intima during balloon angioplasty and involve inflammation, hypersensitivity reactions, and stem cell mobilization particularly of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). The results of these processes are either vessel wall healing or neointimal hyperplasia and/or neo-atherosclerosis. Unravelling the key molecular and signal pathways involved in ISR is crucial to identify appropriate therapeutic strategies aimed at abolishing the 'Achille's heel' of PCI. In this regard, we discuss novel approaches to prevent DES restenosis. Indeed, available evidence suggests that EPC-capturing stents promote rapid stent re-endothelization, which, in turn, has the potential to decrease the risk of stent thrombosis and allow the use of a shorter-duration dual antiplatelet therapy.

Citing Articles

Drug coated balloon angioplasty for de novo coronary lesions in large vessels: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gobbi C, Giangiacomi F, Merinopoulos I, Gherbesi E, Faggiano A, Pasero G Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4921.

PMID: 39929903 PMC: 11811268. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85734-4.


Implementation of the kissing balloon technique using a perfusion balloon in acute myocardial infarction: a case report.

Nakata M, Tabata T, Nago C, Abe M, Uehara H Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2024; 8(8):ytae422.

PMID: 39184170 PMC: 11342964. DOI: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytae422.


Biomechanical factors and atherosclerosis localization: insights and clinical applications.

Bacigalupi E, Pizzicannella J, Rigatelli G, Scorpiglione L, Foglietta M, Rende G Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024; 11:1392702.

PMID: 39119184 PMC: 11306036. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1392702.


A risk score for predicting in-stent restenosis in patients with premature acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent.

Liu S, Yang H, Liu C, Liu Z, Hou J, Wei M Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e34077.

PMID: 39055837 PMC: 11269898. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34077.


Shaping tomorrow's vascular landscape with extracellular matrix stents.

James M, Sehgal V Eur Heart J Open. 2024; 4(3):oeae042.

PMID: 38845793 PMC: 11156198. DOI: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeae042.


References
1.
Pelliccia F, Zimarino M, De Luca G, Viceconte N, Tanzilli G, De Caterina R . Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Coronary Artery Disease: From Bench to Bedside. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022; 11(5):451-460. PMC: 9154346. DOI: 10.1093/stcltm/szac010. View

2.
Wang J, Jin X, Huang Y, Ran X, Luo D, Yang D . Endovascular stent-induced alterations in host artery mechanical environments and their roles in stent restenosis and late thrombosis. Regen Biomater. 2018; 5(3):177-187. PMC: 6007795. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rby006. View

3.
Ferrante G, Niccoli G, Biasucci L, Liuzzo G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L . Association between C-reactive protein and angiographic restenosis after bare metal stents: an updated and comprehensive meta-analysis of 2747 patients. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2008; 9(3):156-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.01.003. View

4.
van der Giessen W, Lincoff A, Schwartz R, van Beusekom H, Serruys P, Holmes Jr D . Marked inflammatory sequelae to implantation of biodegradable and nonbiodegradable polymers in porcine coronary arteries. Circulation. 1996; 94(7):1690-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.94.7.1690. View

5.
Habara S, Mitsudo K, Goto T, Kadota K, Fujii S, Yamamoto H . The impact of lesion length and vessel size on outcomes after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis. Heart. 2007; 94(9):1162-5. DOI: 10.1136/hrt.2007.128595. View