» Articles » PMID: 37803086

First 100 Total Hip Arthroplasties Performed by a Young Surgeon Using the Direct Anterior Approach: Learning Curve and Complications

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 6
PMID 37803086
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Most of the reported discussions about the learning curve for the direct anterior approach (DAA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been by experienced surgeons. The study's aim was to describe the learning curve, short-term outcomes, complications, and adaptations to the DAA used in the first 100 THA cases experienced by a young surgeon who had received DAA training for trauma surgeries.

Materials And Methods: This retrospective study summarizes the first 100 consecutive cases experienced by a young surgeon who performed the unilateral DAA for THA between 2019 and 2021. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was performed to evaluate the learning curve on the basis of operative time and overall complications. The demographics data, short-term outcomes, and complications of the first 50 and second 50 cases were compared.

Results: The CUSUM curve declined after 49 and 55 cases, measured by operative time and overall complications, respectively. The median operative time (104 vs. 80 min) and intraoperative fluoroscopic time (38 vs. 12 s) increased significantly in the first 50 cases compared with the times in the second 50 cases. Complications tended to occur in the first 50 cases (12% vs. 6%), and the overall rate was 9%. Major complications all occurred in the first 50 cases, with a rate of 4%. Only one case, which involved a complicated periprosthetic fracture around the stem that extended to the tip, required the intervention of a senior surgeon.

Conclusions: Even after receiving training on the DAA for trauma surgeries, the young surgeon experienced a steep learning curve and more complications in the first 50 cases. The DAA for THA is a technically demanding procedure and may require guidance from an experienced surgeon to manage unexpected complications.

Citing Articles

Learning curve comparison between switching approach and switching implant in cementless short stem total hip arthroplasty.

Stadler C, Bolm J, Schopper C, Schauer B, Holzbauer M, Gotterbarm T Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024; 144(9):4259-4265.

PMID: 39249133 PMC: 11564367. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-024-05518-9.


A neck-sparing short stem shows significantly lower blood loss in total hip arthroplasty compared to a neck-resecting short stem.

Stadler C, Schauer B, Brabec K, Schopper C, Gotterbarm T, Luger M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19695.

PMID: 37951980 PMC: 10640618. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47008-9.

References
1.
Fehring T, Odum S, Troyer J, Iorio R, Kurtz S, Lau E . Joint replacement access in 2016: a supply side crisis. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(8):1175-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.07.025. View

2.
Mjaaland K, Kivle K, Svenningsen S, Pripp A, Nordsletten L . Comparison of markers for muscle damage, inflammation, and pain using minimally invasive direct anterior versus direct lateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Orthop Res. 2015; 33(9):1305-10. DOI: 10.1002/jor.22911. View

3.
Restrepo C, Parvizi J, Eslam Pour A, Hozack W . Prospective randomized study of two surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(5):671-9.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.02.002. View

4.
Zhou Z, Li Y, Peng Y, Jiang J, Zuo J . Clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach vs. other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs. Front Surg. 2022; 9:1022937. PMC: 9574056. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1022937. View

5.
Wang Z, Bao H, Hou J . Direct anterior versus lateral approaches for clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1):63. PMC: 6390312. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1095-z. View