» Articles » PMID: 37801238

Suggested Flowchart Through Integrated C-Reactive Protein and White Blood Cell Count Analysis for Screening for Early Complications After Gastric Bypass: a Single-Center Retrospective Study

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2023 Oct 6
PMID 37801238
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Early leakage detection following bariatric procedures is crucial, but a standardized evaluation method is lacking. The aim was to validate the potential benefits of postoperative day 1 (POD1) C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and white blood cell (WBC) counts in distinguishing at-risk patients following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) while considering the impact of obesity-related chronic inflammation.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of 261 consecutive patients aged 18-65 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 32.5-50 kg/m who underwent primary RYGB between 2017 and 2022. Sequential changes in CRP levels and WBC counts measured 48 h preoperatively and on POD1 morning were collected and compared between patients with/without complications and in patients without complications stratified by preoperative CRP levels.

Results: Female patients and those with a higher BMI tended to have higher baseline CRP levels, which were positively related to postoperative CRP. Patients experiencing complications had higher WBC counts and a higher prevalence of WBC counts >14,000/μl (77.8% vs. 25.4%; p<0.001) than those without complications. Baseline CRP ≥ 0.3 mg/dl, a longer operative time, and blood loss >10 ml were significantly more common with WBC counts above 14,000/μl; a reasonable range of change in WBC count (∆WBC) derived from its positive correlation to postoperative WBC count (r=0.6695) may serve as a useful complementary indicator.

Conclusion: An individualized CRP threshold setting and integrated interpretation of the WBC count can be more appropriate than using static criteria for differentiating at-risk patients after RYGB. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and determine their generalizability.

Citing Articles

Machine learning analysis of lab tests to predict bariatric readmissions.

Zhang M, Chen R, Yang Y, Sun X, Shan X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):16845.

PMID: 39039130 PMC: 11263698. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-67710-6.


Unraveling Postoperative Bleeding Dynamics in Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Insights from a Single-Center Tranexamic Acid Study.

Lo H, Hsu S, Soong R, Huang S Obes Surg. 2024; 34(8):3012-3020.

PMID: 39037676 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07411-1.

References
1.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen M, Pories W, Fahrbach K . Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004; 292(14):1724-37. DOI: 10.1001/jama.292.14.1724. View

2.
Kim J, Azagury D, Eisenberg D, DeMaria E, Campos G . ASMBS position statement on prevention, detection, and treatment of gastrointestinal leak after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, including the roles of imaging, surgical exploration, and nonoperative management. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015; 11(4):739-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2015.05.001. View

3.
Gonzalez R, Sarr M, Smith C, Baghai M, Kendrick M, Szomstein S . Diagnosis and contemporary management of anastomotic leaks after gastric bypass for obesity. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 204(1):47-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.09.023. View

4.
Bellorin O, Abdemur A, Sucandy I, Szomstein S, Rosenthal R . Understanding the significance, reasons and patterns of abnormal vital signs after gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2010; 21(6):707-13. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-010-0221-0. View

5.
Quartararo G, Facchiano E, Scaringi S, Liscia G, Lucchese M . Upper gastrointestinal series after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: effectiveness in leakage detection. a systematic review of the literature. Obes Surg. 2014; 24(7):1096-101. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-014-1263-5. View