» Articles » PMID: 37794462

Variability and Accuracy of Multiple Saliva Pepsin Measurements in Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the variability and diagnostic value of multiple salivary pepsin measurements in the detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR).

Methods: Patients with LPR symptoms were consecutively recruited from December 2019 to Augustus 2022. Twenty-one asymptomatic individuals completed the study. The diagnostic was confirmed with hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). Patients collected three saliva samples during the 24-h testing period. Symptoms and findings were studied with reflux symptom score-12 and reflux sign assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of pepsin measurements were calculated considering morning, post-lunch and post-dinner samples. The consistency and relationship between HEMII-pH, pepsin measurements, and clinical features were investigated.

Results: Morning, post-lunch and post-dinner saliva pepsin concentrations were measured in 42 patients. Pepsin measurements were 64.9%, 59.5%, and 59.0% sensitive for morning, post-lunch and post-dinner collections at cutoff ≥ 16 ng/mL. Considering the highest concentration of the three pepsin saliva collections, the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and PPV were 70.5%, 73.0%; 66.7% and 78.9%, respectively. Morning pepsin measurements reported higher consistency, sensitivity, and specificity than post-dinner and post-lunch pepsin measurements.

Conclusion: The collection of several saliva pepsin samples improves the detection rate of LPR. In case of high clinical LPR suspicion and negative pepsin test, a HEMII-pH study could provide further diagnostic information.

Citing Articles

Global Transcriptomic Analysis of Topical Sodium Alginate Protection against Peptic Damage in an In Vitro Model of Treatment-Resistant Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Ergun P, Samuels T, Mathison A, Plehhova K, Coyle C, Horvath L Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(19).

PMID: 39409043 PMC: 11605242. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251910714.

References
1.
Lechien J, Akst L, Hamdan A, Schindler A, Karkos P, Barillari M . Evaluation and Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: State of the Art Review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 160(5):762-782. DOI: 10.1177/0194599819827488. View

2.
Klimara M, Johnston N, Samuels T, Visotcky A, Poetker D, Loehrl T . Correlation of salivary and nasal lavage pepsin with MII-pH testing. Laryngoscope. 2019; 130(4):961-966. DOI: 10.1002/lary.28182. View

3.
Lechien J, Bobin F, Dapri G, Eisendrath P, Salem C, Mouawad F . Hypopharyngeal-Esophageal Impedance-pH Monitoring Profiles of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patients. Laryngoscope. 2020; 131(2):268-276. DOI: 10.1002/lary.28736. View

4.
Hirano I . Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006; 23 Suppl 1:12-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.02800.x. View

5.
Lechien J, Allen J, Barillari M, Karkos P, Jia H, Ceccon F . Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Around the World: An International Study. Laryngoscope. 2020; 131(5):E1589-E1597. DOI: 10.1002/lary.29270. View