» Articles » PMID: 37793087

Dissection of the Role of a Src Homology 3 Domain in the Evolution of Binding Preference of Paralogous Proteins

Overview
Journal Genetics
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 Oct 4
PMID 37793087
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) drive many cellular processes. Some interactions are directed by Src homology 3 (SH3) domains that bind proline-rich motifs on other proteins. The evolution of the binding specificity of SH3 domains is not completely understood, particularly following gene duplication. Paralogous genes accumulate mutations that can modify protein functions and, for SH3 domains, their binding preferences. Here, we examined how the binding of the SH3 domains of 2 paralogous yeast type I myosins, Myo3 and Myo5, evolved following duplication. We found that the paralogs have subtly different SH3-dependent interaction profiles. However, by swapping SH3 domains between the paralogs and characterizing the SH3 domains freed from their protein context, we find that very few of the differences in interactions, if any, depend on the SH3 domains themselves. We used ancestral sequence reconstruction to resurrect the preduplication SH3 domains and examined, moving back in time, how the binding preference changed. Although the most recent ancestor of the 2 domains had a very similar binding preference as the extant ones, older ancestral domains displayed a gradual loss of interaction with the modern interaction partners when inserted in the extant paralogs. Molecular docking and experimental characterization of the free ancestral domains showed that their affinity with the proline motifs is likely not the cause for this loss of binding. Taken together, our results suggest that a SH3 and its host protein could create intramolecular or allosteric interactions essential for the SH3-dependent PPIs, making domains not functionally equivalent even when they have the same binding specificity.

Citing Articles

Cryptic genetic variation shapes the fate of gene duplicates in a protein interaction network.

Dibyachintan S, Dube A, Bradley D, Lemieux P, Dionne U, Landry C Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1530.

PMID: 39934115 PMC: 11814230. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56597-0.


Hybrid adaptation is hampered by Haldane's sieve.

Bautista C, Gagnon-Arsenault I, Utrobina M, Fijarczyk A, Bendixsen D, Stelkens R Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10319.

PMID: 39609385 PMC: 11604976. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54105-4.


Cryptic genetic variation shapes the fate of gene duplicates in a protein interaction network.

Dibyachintan S, Dube A, Bradley D, Lemieux P, Dionne U, Landry C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464075 PMC: 10925128. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.23.581840.

References
1.
Usmanova D, Bogatyreva N, Arino Bernad J, Eremina A, Gorshkova A, Kanevskiy G . Self-consistency test reveals systematic bias in programs for prediction change of stability upon mutation. Bioinformatics. 2018; 34(21):3653-3658. PMC: 6198859. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty340. View

2.
Letunic I, Khedkar S, Bork P . SMART: recent updates, new developments and status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020; 49(D1):D458-D460. PMC: 7778883. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaa937. View

3.
Zhang H, Hu H, Wu S, Perrett S . Effect of evolution of the C-terminal region on chaperone activity of Hsp70. Protein Sci. 2022; 32(1):e4549. PMC: 9798248. DOI: 10.1002/pro.4549. View

4.
Dionne U, Bourgault E, Dube A, Bradley D, Chartier F, Dandage R . Protein context shapes the specificity of SH3 domain-mediated interactions in vivo. Nat Commun. 2021; 12(1):1597. PMC: 7954794. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21873-2. View

5.
Shannon P, Markiel A, Ozier O, Baliga N, Wang J, Ramage D . Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 2003; 13(11):2498-504. PMC: 403769. DOI: 10.1101/gr.1239303. View