» Articles » PMID: 37791347

Deep Learning for ECG Arrhythmia Detection and Classification: an Overview of Progress for Period 2017-2023

Overview
Journal Front Physiol
Date 2023 Oct 4
PMID 37791347
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are a leading cause of mortality globally. Electrocardiography (ECG) still represents the benchmark approach for identifying cardiac irregularities. Automatic detection of abnormalities from the ECG can aid in the early detection, diagnosis, and prevention of cardiovascular diseases. Deep Learning (DL) architectures have been successfully employed for arrhythmia detection and classification and offered superior performance to traditional shallow Machine Learning (ML) approaches. This survey categorizes and compares the DL architectures used in ECG arrhythmia detection from 2017-2023 that have exhibited superior performance. Different DL models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), Multilayer Perceptrons (MLPs), Transformers, and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) are reviewed, and a summary of their effectiveness is provided. This survey provides a comprehensive roadmap to expedite the acclimation process for emerging researchers willing to develop efficient algorithms for detecting ECG anomalies using DL models. Our tailored guidelines bridge the knowledge gap allowing newcomers to align smoothly with the prevailing research trends in ECG arrhythmia detection. We shed light on potential areas for future research and refinement in model development and optimization, intending to stimulate advancement in ECG arrhythmia detection and classification.

Citing Articles

Screening for Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms Based on 12 Leads of the Electrocardiogram-Applicable in Clinical Practice?-Critical Literature Review with Meta-Analysis.

Makowska A, Ananthakrishnan G, Christ M, Dehmer M Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(4).

PMID: 39997283 PMC: 11855451. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13040408.


Arrhythmia Detection by Data Fusion of ECG Scalograms and Phasograms.

Scarpiniti M Sensors (Basel). 2025; 24(24.

PMID: 39771779 PMC: 11679398. DOI: 10.3390/s24248043.


Comprehensive Analysis of Cardiovascular Diseases: Symptoms, Diagnosis, and AI Innovations.

Khan M, Haider Z, Hussain J, Malik F, Talib I, Abdullah S Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39768057 PMC: 11673700. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121239.


An improved electrocardiogram arrhythmia classification performance with feature optimization.

Darmawahyuni A, Nurmaini S, Tutuko B, Rachmatullah M, Firdaus F, Sapitri A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024; 24(1):412.

PMID: 39736595 PMC: 11684298. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-024-02822-7.


A hybrid cardiovascular arrhythmia disease detection using ConvNeXt-X models on electrocardiogram signals.

Talukder M, Khalid M, Kazi M, Muna N, Nur-E-Alam M, Halder S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):30366.

PMID: 39638880 PMC: 11621342. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-81992-w.


References
1.
Ozbay Y, Ceylan R, Karlik B . A fuzzy clustering neural network architecture for classification of ECG arrhythmias. Comput Biol Med. 2005; 36(4):376-88. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2005.01.006. View

2.
Attia Z, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, McKie P, Ladewig D, Satam G . Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019; 25(1):70-74. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2. View

3.
Luo K, Li J, Wang Z, Cuschieri A . Patient-Specific Deep Architectural Model for ECG Classification. J Healthc Eng. 2017; 2017:4108720. PMC: 5499251. DOI: 10.1155/2017/4108720. View

4.
Flores N, Avitia R, Reyna M, Garcia C . Readily available ECG databases. J Electrocardiol. 2018; 51(6):1095-1097. DOI: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2018.09.012. View

5.
Aljohani M . Competency in ECG Interpretation and Arrhythmias Management among Critical Care Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Cross Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022; 10(12). PMC: 9777912. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10122576. View