» Articles » PMID: 37790831

Techniques and Fixation of Olecranon Osteotomy: A Systematic Review

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 4
PMID 37790831
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to characterize the incidence of complications regarding olecranon osteotomy, looking more specifically at the type of osteotomy and the fixation construct used to repair the osteotomy.

Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a comprehensive search was performed. A study was included if it was an adult clinical study, a transverse or chevron olecranon osteotomy was performed, and the study explicitly states the fixation construct used to repair the osteotomy. A quality assessment was performed in each study prior to data extraction.

Results: We included 39 studies with a total of 1,445 patients. Most studies included patients who were being treated primarily for a distal humerus fracture. The overall incidence of delayed union was 27/643 (4.2%), with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy than in chevron osteotomy (5/49 (10.2%) vs 22/595 (3.7%)). Nonunion occurred in 43/811 (5.4%) of patients, with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy (6/73 (8.2%) vs. 37/712 (5.2%)). Implant failure or loss of reduction occurred in 44/746 (5.9%) of patients, with a higher rate in transverse osteotomy (11/49 (22.4%) vs 33/688 (4.8%)). The removal of implants occurred in 236/1078 (21.9%) of all patients, with the highest rate in those studies that used plate fixation 44/99 (44.4%).

Conclusions: Compared with chevron osteotomy, patients who underwent transverse osteotomy had a higher incidence of delayed union, nonunion, and implant failure or loss of reduction requiring revision surgery. The incidence of implant removal indicates that patients should be informed that nearly half of the osteotomy fixed with a plate was removed after implantation.

Type Of Study/level Of Evidence: Therapeutic III.

Citing Articles

Postoperative dorsal step-off predicts olecranon osteotomy union: a retrospective cohort study.

Sinkler M, Adelstein J, Kodsy M, Ochenjele G, Sontich J, Wetzel R Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):49.

PMID: 39731688 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04169-1.


A Modified Surgical Approach to the Distal Humerus: The Triceps Bundle Technique.

Rankin I, Dixon J, Goffin J, Johnstone A Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2024; 19(2):99-103.

PMID: 39359365 PMC: 11443618. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1618.


A rare complication of tension band fixation of olecranon osteotomy: Distal migration of K-wire.

Koroglu M, Karakaplan M, Ergen E, Eren M, Alyousef A, Ozdes H Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024; 35(2):439-442.

PMID: 38727126 PMC: 11128946. DOI: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1662.

References
1.
Pastor P, Lopez Valenciano J, Copete I, Prosper Ramos I . Fixation of olecranon osteotomy only with 6'5 mm partially trheaded cancellous screw is a safe an effective method used in surgical management of distal humerus fractures. J Exp Orthop. 2021; 8(1):4. PMC: 7803853. DOI: 10.1186/s40634-020-00317-8. View

2.
Tak S, Dar G, Halwai M, Kangoo K, Mir B . Outcome of olecranon osteotomy in the trans-olecranon approach of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009; 15(6):565-70. View

3.
Woods B, Rosario B, Siska P, Gruen G, Tarkin I, Evans A . Determining the efficacy of screw and washer fixation as a method for securing olecranon osteotomies used in the surgical management of intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 29(1):44-9. DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000131. View

4.
Edwards S, Rhodes D, Jordan T, Sietsema D . The Olecranon Osteotomy-Facilitated Elbow Release (OFER). J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017; 99(21):1859-1865. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00715. View

5.
Iorio T, Wong J, Patterson J, Rekant M . Olecranon osteotomy fixation using a novel device: the olecranon sled. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2013; 17(3):151-7. DOI: 10.1097/BTH.0b013e318298b39d. View