» Articles » PMID: 37790251

A Dual-binding Magnetic Immunoassay to Predict Spontaneous Preterm Birth

Overview
Date 2023 Oct 4
PMID 37790251
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Complications posed by preterm birth (delivery before 37 weeks of pregnancy) are a leading cause of newborn morbidity and mortality. The previous discovery and validation of an algorithm that includes maternal serum protein biomarkers, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 4 (IBP4), with clinical factors to predict preterm birth represents an opportunity for the development of a widely accessible point-of-care assay to guide clinical management. Toward this end, we developed SHBG and IBP4 quantification assays for maternal serum using giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors and a self-normalizing dual-binding magnetic immunoassay. The assays have a picomolar limit of detections (LOD) with a relatively broad dynamic range that covers the physiological level of the analytes as they change throughout gestation. Measurement of serum from pregnant donors using the GMR assays was highly concordant with those obtained using a clinical mass spectrometry (MS)-based assay for the same protein markers. The MS assay requires capitally intense equipment and highly trained operators with a few days turnaround time, whereas the GMR assays can be performed in minutes on small, inexpensive instruments with minimal personnel training and microfluidic automation. The potential for high sensitivity, accuracy, and speed of the GMR assays, along with low equipment and personnel requirements, make them good candidates for developing point-of-care tests. Rapid turnaround risk assessment for preterm birth would enable patient testing and counseling at the same clinic visit, thereby increasing the timeliness of recommended interventions.

Citing Articles

A GMR enzymatic assay for quantifying nuclease and peptidase activity.

Sveiven M, Serrano A, Rosenberg J, Conrad D, Hall D, ODonoghue A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1363186.

PMID: 38544982 PMC: 10966768. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1363186.

References
1.
Casalino L, Dunham D, Chin M, Bielang R, Kistner E, Karrison T . Frequency of failure to inform patients of clinically significant outpatient test results. Arch Intern Med. 2009; 169(12):1123-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.130. View

2.
Tan Y, Liu M, Nolting B, Go J, Gervay-Hague J, Liu G . A nanoengineering approach for investigation and regulation of protein immobilization. ACS Nano. 2009; 2(11):2374-84. PMC: 4512660. DOI: 10.1021/nn800508f. View

3.
Norwitz E, Caughey A . Progesterone supplementation and the prevention of preterm birth. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 4(2):60-72. PMC: 3218546. View

4.
Garite T, Manuck T . Should case management be considered a component of obstetrical interventions for pregnancies at risk of preterm birth?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 228(4):430-437. PMC: 10024643. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.022. View

5.
Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R, Fonseca E, OBrien J, Cetingoz E, Creasy G . Vaginal progesterone is as effective as cervical cerclage to prevent preterm birth in women with a singleton gestation, previous spontaneous preterm birth, and a short cervix: updated indirect comparison meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 219(1):10-25. PMC: 6449041. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.03.028. View