» Articles » PMID: 37789043

Speech-derived Haptic Stimulation Enhances Speech Recognition in a Multi-talker Background

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Oct 3
PMID 37789043
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Speech understanding, while effortless in quiet conditions, is challenging in noisy environments. Previous studies have revealed that a feasible approach to supplement speech-in-noise (SiN) perception consists in presenting speech-derived signals as haptic input. In the current study, we investigated whether the presentation of a vibrotactile signal derived from the speech temporal envelope can improve SiN intelligibility in a multi-talker background for untrained, normal-hearing listeners. We also determined if vibrotactile sensitivity, evaluated using vibrotactile detection thresholds, modulates the extent of audio-tactile SiN improvement. In practice, we measured participants' speech recognition in a multi-talker noise without (audio-only) and with (audio-tactile) concurrent vibrotactile stimulation delivered in three schemes: to the left or right palm, or to both. Averaged across the three stimulation delivery schemes, the vibrotactile stimulation led to a significant improvement of 0.41 dB in SiN recognition when compared to the audio-only condition. Notably, there were no significant differences observed between the improvements in these delivery schemes. In addition, audio-tactile SiN benefit was significantly predicted by participants' vibrotactile threshold levels and unimodal (audio-only) SiN performance. The extent of the improvement afforded by speech-envelope-derived vibrotactile stimulation was in line with previously uncovered vibrotactile enhancements of SiN perception in untrained listeners with no known hearing impairment. Overall, these results highlight the potential of concurrent vibrotactile stimulation to improve SiN recognition, especially in individuals with poor SiN perception abilities, and tentatively more so with increasing tactile sensitivity. Moreover, they lend support to the multimodal accounts of speech perception and research on tactile speech aid devices.

Citing Articles

Sensory-substitution based sound perception using a spinal computer-brain interface.

Miklos G, Halasz L, Hasslberger M, Toth E, Manola L, Hagh Gooie S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):24879.

PMID: 39438593 PMC: 11496521. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-75779-2.


Improved speech intelligibility in the presence of congruent vibrotactile speech input.

Schulte A, Marozeau J, Ruhe A, Buchner A, Kral A, Innes-Brown H Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):22657.

PMID: 38114599 PMC: 10730903. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48893-w.

References
1.
Molholm S, Ritter W, Murray M, Javitt D, Schroeder C, Foxe J . Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002; 14(1):115-28. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00066-6. View

2.
Gescheider G, Verrillo R, McCann J, ALDRICH E . Effects of the menstrual cycle on vibrotactile sensitivity. Percept Psychophys. 1984; 36(6):586-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03207520. View

3.
Myers B, Lense M, Gordon R . Pushing the Envelope: Developments in Neural Entrainment to Speech and the Biological Underpinnings of Prosody Perception. Brain Sci. 2019; 9(3). PMC: 6468669. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci9030070. View

4.
Kim M, Kwon H, Yang T, Kim K . Vibration Alert to the Brain: Evoked and Induced MEG Responses to High-Frequency Vibrotactile Stimuli on the Index Finger of Dominant and Non-dominant Hand. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020; 14:576082. PMC: 7674801. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.576082. View

5.
Leek M . Adaptive procedures in psychophysical research. Percept Psychophys. 2002; 63(8):1279-92. DOI: 10.3758/bf03194543. View