» Articles » PMID: 37784246

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors Upon Hospital Discharge of People With Diabetes: Promise, Barriers, and Opportunity

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2023 Oct 3
PMID 37784246
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have increasingly been used in ambulatory and inpatient or hospital settings to improve glycemic outcomes for people with diabetes. Given their capacity to aid individuals in avoiding hypo- and hyperglycemia, they may also be useful when transitioning from hospital to home by reducing rates of hospital readmissions and emergency department visits. Several types of barriers presently exist that make the deployment of CGMs at the time of hospital discharge problematic, including (1) regulatory, (2) behavioral, (3) logistical, (4) technical, (5) staffing, and (6) systemic issues. In this commentary, we review the literature, discuss these barriers, and propose possible solutions to facilitate the use of CGMs in people with diabetes at the time of hospital discharge.

Citing Articles

Hyperglycemic Crises in Adults With Diabetes: A Consensus Report.

Umpierrez G, Davis G, ElSayed N, Fadini G, Galindo R, Hirsch I Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(8):1257-1275.

PMID: 39052901 PMC: 11272983. DOI: 10.2337/dci24-0032.


Hyperglycaemic crises in adults with diabetes: a consensus report.

Umpierrez G, Davis G, ElSayed N, Fadini G, Galindo R, Hirsch I Diabetologia. 2024; 67(8):1455-1479.

PMID: 38907161 PMC: 11343900. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-024-06183-8.

References
1.
Depczynski B, Poynten A . Acceptance and Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Discharge From Hospital in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Open-label, Prospective, Controlled Study. JMIR Diabetes. 2022; 7(2):e35163. PMC: 9127644. DOI: 10.2196/35163. View

2.
Chico A, Vidal-Rios P, Subira M, Novials A . The continuous glucose monitoring system is useful for detecting unrecognized hypoglycemias in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes but is not better than frequent capillary glucose measurements for improving metabolic control. Diabetes Care. 2003; 26(4):1153-7. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.26.4.1153. View

3.
Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C . The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021; 372:n71. PMC: 8005924. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71. View

4.
Michaud T, Hill J, Estabrooks P, Su D . Cost analysis of a remote patient monitoring programme for post-discharge patients with type 2 diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2021; 29(6):417-425. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X20985393. View

5.
Galindo R, Aleppo G, Klonoff D, Spanakis E, Agarwal S, Vellanki P . Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital: Emergent Considerations for Remote Glucose Monitoring During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020; 14(4):822-832. PMC: 7673156. DOI: 10.1177/1932296820932903. View