» Articles » PMID: 37783758

The Relationship Between Length of Denosumab Treatment for Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Serum TRAcP5b Measured Six Months After the Last Injection

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2023 Oct 2
PMID 37783758
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In women with postmenopausal osteoporosis the aetiology of the observed inverse relationship between duration of denosumab (Dmab) therapy and bone loss after its discontinuation is currently unknown. In studies in mice inhibition of RANKL is associated with an increase in osteomorphs and osteoclast precursors that recycle into osteoclasts and may accumulate with time. We hypothesized that longer inhibition of RANKL by Dmab will be followed by the synchronous formation of a larger number of osteoclasts after stopping treatment. To test this hypothesis, we measured serum TRAcP5b, a marker of osteoclast numbers, in postmenopausal women treated with Dmab for different periods of time up to 10 years.

Methods: TRAcP5b, C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were measured at 6.0 months ± 15 days after last Dmab injection in 59 women who had received Dmab for 4.0 ± 2.3 years (range 1-10 years). Of these, 38 were treatment naïve (group 1) and 21 had received other treatments prior Dmab (group 2).

Results: Duration of Dmab treatment was not related to serum TRAcP5b values or to TRAcP5b/CTX ratio either in the whole cohort or in each of the two groups separately. In contrast, serum TRAcP5b values were significantly correlated with serum CTX values (r = 0.619; p < 0.001), but not with serum P1NP values or BMD at all skeletal sites.

Conclusion: Our observations indicate that serum TRAcP5b, measured at 6 months after a Dmab injection, is not a useful early marker for time-dependent increased accumulation of osteoclasts in humans and for identification of patients at risk for a higher rebound increase in bone resorption.

References
1.
Solling A, Tsourdi E, Harslof T, Langdahl B . Denosumab Discontinuation. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2022; 21(1):95-103. DOI: 10.1007/s11914-022-00771-6. View

2.
Makras P, Appelman-Dijkstra N, Papapoulos S, van Wissen S, Winter E, Polyzos S . The Duration of Denosumab Treatment and the Efficacy of Zoledronate to Preserve Bone Mineral Density After Its Discontinuation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 106(10):e4155-e4162. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab321. View

3.
Solling A, Harslof T, Langdahl B . Treatment With Zoledronate Subsequent to Denosumab in Osteoporosis: A 2-Year Randomized Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2021; 36(7):1245-1254. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4305. View

4.
Ferrari S . Short or Long-term Osteoporosis Therapy With Denosumab?. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021; 107(4):e1760-e1762. DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab627. View

5.
Ferrari S, Langdahl B . Mechanisms underlying the long-term and withdrawal effects of denosumab therapy on bone. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2023; 19(5):307-317. DOI: 10.1038/s41584-023-00935-3. View