Association Between the Attention Network Test, Neuropsychological Measures, and Disability in Post-Acute Traumatic Brain Injury

Overview

Journal Neurotrauma Rep

Date 2023 Sep 29

PMID 37771426

Authors

Abhishek Jaywant

Emily Blunt

Keith Jamison

Nayoung Kim

Arindam RoyChoudhury

Nicholas D Schiff

Amy Kuceyeski

Kristen Dams-OConnor

Sudhin Shah

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Cognitive impairment after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is persistent and disabling. Assessing cognitive function in a reliable and valid manner, using measures that are sensitive to the integrity of underlying neural substrates, is crucial in clinical research. The Attention Network Test (ANT) is one such assessment measure that has demonstrated associations with neural regions involved in attention; however, clinical utility of the ANT is limited because its relationship with neuropsychological measures of cognitive function (i.e., its construct validity) has not yet been established in TBI. We evaluated the association between the ANT and 1) a neuropsychological battery assessing executive function and memory and 2) global function assessed by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Forty-eight adults with complicated mild-severe TBI were evaluated ∼5 months post-injury. Using principal component analysis and multi-variate linear regression adjusted for age, gender, education, and cause of injury, we found that ANT reaction time and executive network scores predicted a principal component assessing processing speed and executive function. Conversely, the ANT did not predict a principal component assessing memory. The ANT was weakly associated with the GOSE. Among persons with TBI during the post-acute phase of recovery, the ANT has good construct validity as evidenced by its associations with neuropsychological measures of processing speed and executive function, but not memory. Given that ANT networks are known to relate to specific neuroanatomical regions, the ANT may be a useful outcome measure for evaluating novel therapeutics targeting attention and executive functions after TBI.

References

Neuhaus A, Urbanek C, Opgen-Rhein C, Hahn E, Ta T, Koehler S . Event-related potentials associated with Attention Network Test. Int J Psychophysiol. 2010; 76(2):72-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.02.005. View

Hahn E, Ta T, Hahn C, Kuehl L, Ruehl C, Neuhaus A . Test-retest reliability of Attention Network Test measures in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011; 133(1-3):218-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2011.09.026. View

Dymowski A, Owens J, Ponsford J, Willmott C . Speed of processing and strategic control of attention after traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2015; 37(10):1024-35. DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2015.1074663. View

Spitz G, Ponsford J, Rudzki D, Maller J . Association between cognitive performance and functional outcome following traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal multilevel examination. Neuropsychology. 2012; 26(5):604-12. DOI: 10.1037/a0029239. View

Ishigami Y, Fisk J, Wojtowicz M, Klein R . Repeated measurement of the attention components of patients with multiple sclerosis using the Attention Network Test-Interaction (ANT-I): stability, isolability, robustness, and reliability. J Neurosci Methods. 2013; 216(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.02.013. View

Xuan B, Mackie M, Spagna A, Wu T, Tian Y, Hof P . The activation of interactive attentional networks. Neuroimage. 2016; 129:308-319. PMC: 4803523. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.01.017. View

Fan J, McCandliss B, Sommer T, Raz A, Posner M . Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. J Cogn Neurosci. 2002; 14(3):340-7. DOI: 10.1162/089892902317361886. View

Guilmette T, Sweet J, Hebben N, Koltai D, Mahone E, Spiegler B . American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on uniform labeling of performance test scores. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020; 34(3):437-453. DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1722244. View

Venkatesan U, Hillary F . Functional connectivity within lateral posterior parietal cortex in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychology. 2019; 33(6):893-910. DOI: 10.1037/neu0000553. View

10.

Ruet A, Bayen E, Jourdan C, Ghout I, Meaude L, Lalanne A . A Detailed Overview of Long-Term Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Eight Years Post-injury. Front Neurol. 2019; 10:120. PMC: 6393327. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00120. View

11.

Verissimo J, Verhaeghen P, Goldman N, Weinstein M, Ullman M . Evidence that ageing yields improvements as well as declines across attention and executive functions. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 6(1):97-110. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01169-7. View

12.

Wang B, Zhang J, Pan W, Cao S, Li B, Bai L . Differential Influence of Location-Specific White-Matter Hyperintensities on Attention Subdomains Measured Using the Attention Network Test. Med Sci Monit. 2020; 26:e921874. PMC: 6983326. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.921874. View

13.

Nguyen C, Copeland C, Lowe D, Heyanka D, Linck J . Contribution of executive functioning to instrumental activities of daily living in older adults. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2019; 27(4):326-333. DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2018.1550408. View

14.

Silverberg N, Crane P, Dams-OConnor K, Holdnack J, Ivins B, Lange R . Developing a Cognition Endpoint for Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials. J Neurotrauma. 2016; 34(2):363-371. PMC: 5220527. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4443. View

15.

Tsai Y, Liu C, Huang H, Lin J, Chen P, Su Y . A Meta-analysis of Dynamic Prevalence of Cognitive Deficits in the Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Phases After Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurosci Nurs. 2021; 53(2):63-68. DOI: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000570. View

16.

Almeida R, Faria-Jr A, Klein R . On the origins and evolution of the Attention Network Tests. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021; 126:560-572. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.028. View

17.

Halterman C, Langan J, Drew A, Rodriguez E, Osternig L, Chou L . Tracking the recovery of visuospatial attention deficits in mild traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2005; 129(Pt 3):747-53. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh705. View

18.

Walz J, Mani R, Alnawmasi M, Khuu S . Visuospatial Attention Allocation as an Indicator of Cognitive Deficit in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021; 15:675376. PMC: 8329082. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.675376. View

19.

Schretlen D, Shapiro A . A quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2004; 15(4):341-9. DOI: 10.1080/09540260310001606728. View

20.

Shah S, Goldin Y, Conte M, Goldfine A, Mohamadpour M, Fidali B . Executive attention deficits after traumatic brain injury reflect impaired recruitment of resources. Neuroimage Clin. 2017; 14:233-241. PMC: 5288490. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.01.010. View