» Articles » PMID: 37769441

Domestication is Associated with Increased Interspecific Hybrid Compatibility in Landfowl (order: Galliformes)

Overview
Journal J Hered
Specialty Genetics
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37769441
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Some species are able to hybridize despite being exceptionally diverged. The causes of this variation in accumulation of reproductive isolation remain poorly understood, and domestication as an impetus or hindrance to reproductive isolation remains to be characterized. In this study, we investigated the role of divergence time, domestication, and mismatches in morphology, habitat, and clutch size among hybridizing species on reproductive isolation in the bird order Galliformes. We compiled and analyzed hybridization occurrences from literature and recorded measures of postzygotic reproductive isolation. We used a text-mining approach leveraging a historical aviculture magazine to quantify the degree of domestication across species. We obtained divergence time, morphology, habitat, and clutch size data from open sources. We found 123 species pairs (involving 77 species) with known offspring fertility (sterile, only males fertile, or both sexes fertile). We found that divergence time and clutch size were significant predictors of reproductive isolation (McFadden's Pseudo-R2 = 0.59), but not habitat or morphological mismatch. Perhaps most interesting, we found a significant relationship between domestication and reproductive compatibility after correcting for phylogeny, removing extreme values, and addressing potential biases (F1,74 = 5.43, R2 = 0.06, P-value = 0.02). We speculate that the genetic architecture and disruption in selective reproductive regimes associated with domestication may impact reproductive isolation, causing domesticated species to be more reproductively labile.

Citing Articles

Embryonic Lethality, Juvenile Growth Variation, and Adult Sterility Correlate With Phylogenetic Distance of Danionin Hybrids.

Trevena R, Veire B, Chamberlain T, Moravec C, Pelegri F Evol Dev. 2024; 27(1):e12495.

PMID: 39639649 PMC: 11621593. DOI: 10.1111/ede.12495.

References
1.
Shizuka D, Hudson E . To accept or reject heterospecific mates: behavioural decisions underlying premating isolation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1802):20190484. PMC: 7331003. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0484. View

2.
Frank S . DIVERGENCE OF MEIOTIC DRIVE-SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS AS AN EXPLANATION FOR SEX-BIASED HYBRID STERILITY AND INVIABILITY. Evolution. 2017; 45(2):262-267. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04401.x. View

3.
Tao Y, Hartl D . Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution. 2003; 57(11):2580-98. DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01501.x. View

4.
Demuth J, Wade M . Population differentiation in the beetleTribolium castaneum. I. Genetic architecture. Evolution. 2007; 61(3):494-509. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00048.x. View

5.
Coughlan J, Matute D . The importance of intrinsic postzygotic barriers throughout the speciation process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1806):20190533. PMC: 7423280. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0533. View