6.
Maev I, Kucheryavyy Y, Gubergrits N, Bonnacker I, Shelest E, Janssen-van Solingen G
. Differences in In Vitro Properties of Pancreatin Preparations for Pancreatic Exocrine Insufficiency as Marketed in Russia and CIS. Drugs R D. 2020; 20(4):369-376.
PMC: 7691409.
DOI: 10.1007/s40268-020-00326-z.
View
7.
Arshad M, Zafar S, Yousef B, Alyassin Y, Ali R, Alasiri A
. A review of emerging technologies enabling improved solid oral dosage form manufacturing and processing. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021; 178:113840.
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.113840.
View
8.
de la Fuente M, Lombardero L, Gomez-Gonzalez A, Solari C, Angulo-Barturen I, Acera A
. Enzyme Therapy: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(17).
PMC: 8431097.
DOI: 10.3390/ijms22179181.
View
9.
Lohr J, Hummel F, Pirilis K, Steinkamp G, Korner A, Henniges F
. Properties of different pancreatin preparations used in pancreatic exocrine insufficiency. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 21(9):1024-31.
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328328f414.
View
10.
Adeleye O
. Relationship between compression pressure, mechanical strength and release properties of tablets. Polim Med. 2019; 49(1):27-33.
DOI: 10.17219/pim/111888.
View
11.
Zarrintan M, Teng C, Groves M
. The effect of compactional pressure on a wheat germ lipase preparation. Pharm Res. 1990; 7(3):247-50.
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015817927505.
View
12.
Kuny T, Leuenberger H
. Compression behaviour of the enzyme beta-galactosidase and its mixture with microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm. 2003; 260(1):137-47.
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5173(03)00253-9.
View
13.
Teng C, Groves M
. The effect of compactional pressure on urease activity. Pharm Res. 1988; 5(12):776-80.
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015988718381.
View
14.
Zhu C, Li F, Zhang Y, Gupta R, Patel S, Lee J
. Recent Strategies for the Immobilization of Therapeutic Enzymes. Polymers (Basel). 2022; 14(7).
PMC: 9003532.
DOI: 10.3390/polym14071409.
View
15.
Melamed P, Melamed F
. Chronic metabolic acidosis destroys pancreas. JOP. 2014; 15(6):552-60.
DOI: 10.6092/1590-8577/2854.
View
16.
Picker K
. Influence of tableting on the enzymatic activity of different alpha-amylases using various excipients. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2002; 53(2):181-5.
DOI: 10.1016/s0939-6411(01)00243-0.
View
17.
Kuhn R, Eyting S, Henniges F, Potthoff A
. In Vitro Comparison of Physical Parameters, Enzyme Activity, Acid Resistance, and pH Dissolution Characteristics of Enteric-Coated Pancreatic Enzyme Preparations: Implications for Clinical Variability and Pharmacy Substitution. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 12(2):115-28.
PMC: 3462091.
DOI: 10.5863/1551-6776-12.2.115.
View
18.
Rutkowski S, Si T, Gai M, Sun M, Frueh J, He Q
. Magnetically-guided hydrogel capsule motors produced via ultrasound assisted hydrodynamic electrospray ionization jetting. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019; 541:407-417.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.01.103.
View
19.
WURSTER D, Ternik R
. Pressure-induced activity loss in solid state catalase. J Pharm Sci. 1995; 84(2):190-4.
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600840213.
View
20.
Shrikhande S, Prasad V, Dominguez-Munoz J, Weigl K, Sarda K
. In vitro Comparison of Pancreatic Enzyme Preparations Available in the Indian Market. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2021; 15:3835-3843.
PMC: 8434830.
DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S319949.
View