» Articles » PMID: 37760585

Follow-Up After Curative Surgical Treatment of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma for Early Detection of Recurrence: Which Patients Have More or Fewer Visits Than Advised in Guidelines?

Overview
Journal Cancers (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37760585
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Follow-up (FU) in soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients is designed for early detection of disease recurrence. Current guidelines are not evidenced-based and not tailored to patient or tumor characteristics, so they remain debated, particularly given concerns about cost, radiation frequency, and over-testing. This study assesses the extent to which STS patients received guideline-concordant FU and to characterize which type of patients received more or fewer visits than advised.

Methods: All STS patients surgically treated at the Leiden University Medical Center between 2000-2020 were included. For each patient, along with individual characteristics, all radiological examinations from FU start up to 5 years were included and compared to guidelines. Recurrence was defined as local/regional recurrence or metastasis.

Results: A total of 394 patients was included, of whom 250 patients had a high-grade tumor (63.5%). Only 24% of patients received the advised three FU visits in the first year. More FU visits were observed in younger patients and those diagnosed with a high-grade tumor. Among patients with a recurrence, 10% received fewer visits than advised, while 28% of patients without a recurrence received more visits than advised.

Conclusions: A minority of STS patients received guideline-concordant FU visits, suggesting that clinicians seem to incorporate recurrence risk in decisions on FU frequency.

Citing Articles

Integrated Care in Specialized Networks: Leveraging Early Referrals to Reduce Local Recurrence in Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Scharer M, Hosli P, Heesen P, Schelling G, Obergfell T, Nydegger K Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39518055 PMC: 11544970. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16213616.

References
1.
Richardson K, Potter M, Damron T . Image intensive soft tissue sarcoma surveillance uncovers pathology earlier than patient complaints but with frequent initially indeterminate lesions. J Surg Oncol. 2016; 113(7):818-22. DOI: 10.1002/jso.24230. View

2.
van Bodegom-Vos L, Marang-van de Mheen P . Reducing Low-Value Care: Uncertainty as Crucial Cross-Cutting Theme Comment on "Key Factors That Promote Low-Value Care: Views of Experts From the United States, Canada, and the Netherlands". Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022; 11(9):1964-1966. PMC: 9808241. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.7027. View

3.
van Praag V, Rueten-Budde A, Jeys L, Laitinen M, Pollock R, Aston W . A prediction model for treatment decisions in high-grade extremity soft-tissue sarcomas: Personalised sarcoma care (PERSARC). Eur J Cancer. 2017; 83:313-323. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.06.032. View

4.
Gerrand C, Billingham L, Woll P, Grimer R . Follow up after Primary Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Survey of Current Practice in the United Kingdom. Sarcoma. 2008; 2007:34128. PMC: 2225460. DOI: 10.1155/2007/34128. View

5.
von Mehren M, Kane J, Agulnik M, Bui M, Carr-Ascher J, Choy E . Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022; 20(7):815-833. PMC: 10186762. DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0035. View