» Articles » PMID: 37760156

Exploiting Information in Event-Related Brain Potentials from Average Temporal Waveform, Time-Frequency Representation, and Phase Dynamics

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37760156
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Characterizing the brain's dynamic pattern of response to an input in electroencephalography (EEG) is not a trivial task due to the entanglement of the complex spontaneous brain activity. In this context, the brain's response can be defined as (1) the additional neural activity components generated after the input or (2) the changes in the ongoing spontaneous activities induced by the input. Moreover, the response can be manifested in multiple features. Three commonly studied examples of features are (1) transient temporal waveform, (2) time-frequency representation, and (3) phase dynamics. The most extensively used method of average event-related potentials (ERPs) captures the first one, while the latter two and other more complex features are attracting increasing attention. However, there has not been much work providing a systematic illustration and guidance for how to effectively exploit multifaceted features in neural cognitive research. Based on a visual oddball ERPs dataset with 200 participants, this work demonstrates how the information from the above-mentioned features are complementary to each other and how they can be integrated based on stereotypical neural-network-based machine learning approaches to better exploit neural dynamic information in basic and applied cognitive research.

Citing Articles

Machine Learning Classification of Event-Related Brain Potentials during a Visual Go/NoGo Task.

Bryniarska A, Ramos J, Fernandez M Entropy (Basel). 2024; 26(3).

PMID: 38539732 PMC: 11670797. DOI: 10.3390/e26030220.

References
1.
Klimesch W . EEG alpha and theta oscillations reflect cognitive and memory performance: a review and analysis. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 1999; 29(2-3):169-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(98)00056-3. View

2.
Mishra A, Englitz B, Cohen M . EEG microstates as a continuous phenomenon. Neuroimage. 2019; 208:116454. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116454. View

3.
Gibson E, Lobaugh N, Joordens S, McIntosh A . EEG variability: Task-driven or subject-driven signal of interest?. Neuroimage. 2022; 252:119034. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119034. View

4.
Pion-Tonachini L, Kreutz-Delgado K, Makeig S . ICLabel: An automated electroencephalographic independent component classifier, dataset, and website. Neuroimage. 2019; 198:181-197. PMC: 6592775. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.05.026. View

5.
Ouyang G . A generic neural factor linking resting-state neural dynamics and the brain's response to unexpectedness in multilevel cognition. Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(6):2931-2946. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac251. View