» Articles » PMID: 37760108

Development and Validation of a Novel In Vitro Joint Testing System for Reproduction of In Vivo Dynamic Muscle Force

Overview
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37760108
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vitro biomechanical experiments utilizing cadaveric specimens are one of the most effective methods for rehearsing surgical procedures, testing implants, and guiding postoperative rehabilitation. Applying dynamic physiological muscle force to the specimens is a challenge to reconstructing the environment of bionic mechanics in vivo, which is often ignored in the in vitro experiment. The current work aims to establish a hardware platform and numerical computation methods to reproduce dynamic muscle forces that can be applied to mechanical testing on in vitro specimens. Dynamic muscle loading is simulated through numerical computation, and the inputs of the platform will be derived. Then, the accuracy and robustness of the platform will be evaluated through actual muscle loading tests in vitro. The tests were run on three muscles (gastrocnemius lateralis, the rectus femoris, and the semitendinosus) around the knee joint and the results showed that the platform can accurately reproduce the magnitude of muscle strength (errors range from -6.2% to 1.81%) and changing pattern (goodness-of-fit range coefficient ranges from 0.00 to 0.06) of target muscle forces. The robustness of the platform is mainly manifested in that the platform can still accurately reproduce muscle force after changing the hardware combination. Additionally, the standard deviation of repeated test results is very small (standard ranges of hardware combination 1: 0.34 N~2.79 N vs. hardware combination 2: 0.68 N~2.93 N). Thus, the platform can stably and accurately reproduce muscle forces in vitro, and it has great potential to be applied in the future musculoskeletal loading system.

Citing Articles

Advanced Engineering Technology in Orthopedic Research.

Cheng R, Wang H, Cheng C Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(9).

PMID: 39329667 PMC: 11440107. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11090925.

References
1.
Willinger L, Shinohara S, Athwal K, Ball S, Williams A, Amis A . Length-change patterns of the medial collateral ligament and posterior oblique ligament in relation to their function and surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(12):3720-3732. PMC: 7669796. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06050-0. View

2.
Park G, Lee K, Koo S . Uniqueness of gait kinematics in a cohort study. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):15248. PMC: 8316524. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94815-z. View

3.
Lv S, Dudek D, Cao Y, Balamurali M, Gosline J, Li H . Designed biomaterials to mimic the mechanical properties of muscles. Nature. 2010; 465(7294):69-73. DOI: 10.1038/nature09024. View

4.
Popovic D, Stein R, Oguztoreli N, Lebiedowska M, Jonic S . Optimal control of walking with functional electrical stimulation: a computer simulation study. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1999; 7(1):69-79. DOI: 10.1109/86.750554. View

5.
Miyaji N, Holthof S, Bastos R, Ball S, Espregueira-Mendes J, Williams A . A Triple-Strand Anatomic Medial Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Restores Knee Stability More Completely Than a Double-Strand Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study In Vitro. Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50(7):1832-1842. PMC: 9160957. DOI: 10.1177/03635465221090612. View