» Articles » PMID: 37759847

Variability in Motor Threshold During Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Treatment for Depression: Neurophysiological Implications

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Sep 28
PMID 37759847
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The measurement of the motor threshold (MT) is an important element in determining stimulation intensity during Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation treatment (rTMS). The current recommendations propose its realization at least once a week. The variability in this motor threshold is an important factor to consider as it could translate certain neurophysiological specificities. We conducted a retrospective naturalistic study on data from 30 patients treated for treatment-resistant depression in an rTMS-specialized center. For each patient, weekly motor-evoked potential (MEP) was performed and several clinical elements were collected as part of our clinical interviews. Regarding response to treatment (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) before and after treatment), there was a mean difference of -8.88 (-21 to 0) in PHQ9 in the Theta Burst group, of -9.00 (-18 to -1) in the High-Frequency (10 Hz) group, and of -4.66 (-10 to +2) in the Low-Frequency (1 Hz) group. The mean improvement in depressive symptoms was 47% ( < 0.001, effect-size: 1.60). The motor threshold changed over the course of the treatment, with a minimum individual range of 1 point and a maximum of 19 points (total subset), and a greater concentration in the remission group (4 to 10) than in the other groups (3 to 10 in the response group, 1 to 8 in the partial response group, 3 to 19 in the stagnation group). We also note that the difference between MT at week 1 and week 6 was statistically significant only in the remission group, with a different evolutionary profile showing an upward trend in MT. Our findings suggest a potential predictive value of MT changes during treatment, particularly an increase in MT in patients who achieve remission and a distinct "break" in MT around the 4th week, which could predict nonresponse.

Citing Articles

Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex does not directly affect muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans.

McCarthy B, Sesa-Ashton G, Rim D, Henderson L, Macefield V Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(12).

PMID: 39710610 PMC: 11663512. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae484.


Neuronavigated Right Orbitofrontal 20 Hz Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Augmentation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder with Comorbid Depression and Anxiety Disorders: An Open-Label Study.

Stubbeman W, Yang J, Converse J, Gencosmanoglu M, Morales Ortega D, Morris J Brain Sci. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38790461 PMC: 11120198. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14050483.

References
1.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

2.
Wang Y, Gorenstein C . Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: a comprehensive review. Braz J Psychiatry. 2014; 35(4):416-31. DOI: 10.1590/1516-4446-2012-1048. View

3.
Li C, Chen M, Juan C, Huang H, Chen L, Hsieh J . Efficacy of prefrontal theta-burst stimulation in refractory depression: a randomized sham-controlled study. Brain. 2014; 137(Pt 7):2088-98. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu109. View

4.
Zhdanava M, Pilon D, Ghelerter I, Chow W, Joshi K, Lefebvre P . The Prevalence and National Burden of Treatment-Resistant Depression and Major Depressive Disorder in the United States. J Clin Psychiatry. 2021; 82(2). DOI: 10.4088/JCP.20m13699. View

5.
Bajbouj M, Brakemeier E, Schubert F, Lang U, Neu P, Schindowski C . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cortical excitability in patients with major depressive disorder. Exp Neurol. 2005; 196(2):332-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2005.08.008. View