» Articles » PMID: 37754802

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch and Aortic Root Enlargement: Indications, Techniques and Outcomes

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) is defined as implanting a prosthetic that is insufficiently sized for the patient receiving it. PPM leads to high residual transvalvular gradients post-aortic valve replacement and consequently results in left ventricular dysfunction, morbidity and mortality in both the short and long term. Younger patients and patients with poor preoperative left ventricular function are more vulnerable to increased mortality secondary to PPM. There is debate over the measurement of valvular effective orifice area (EOA) and variation exists in how manufacturers report the EOA. The most reliable technique is using in vivo echocardiographic measurements to create tables of predicted EOAs for different valve sizes. PPM can be prevented surgically in patients at risk through aortic root enlargement (ARE). Established techniques include the posterior enlargement through Nicks and Manouguian procedures, and aortico-ventriculoplasty with the Konno-Rastan procedure, which allows for a greater enlargement but carries increased surgical risk. A contemporary development is the Yang procedure, which uses a Y-shaped incision created through the non- and left-coronary cusp commissure, undermining the nadirs of the non- and left-coronary cusps. Early results are promising and demonstrate an ability to safely increase the aortic root by up to two to three sizes. Aortic root enlargement thus remains a valuable and safe tool in addressing PPM, and should be considered during surgical planning.

Citing Articles

A Retrospective Analysis of Standardized Gradient Calculations for Evaluating Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch Following Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement.

Saglam M, Uguz E, Erdogan K, Ercelik H, Yucel M, Alili A Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075814 PMC: 11898662. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15050567.

References
1.
Sa M, Van den Eynde J, Amabile A, Malin J, Jacquemyn X, Tasoudis P . Late Outcomes After Aortic Root Enlargement During Aortic Valve Replacement: Meta-Analysis With Reconstructed Time-To-Event Data. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022; 36(8 Pt B):3065-3073. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.04.013. View

2.
Nicks R, CARTMILL T, Bernstein L . Hypoplasia of the aortic root. The problem of aortic valve replacement. Thorax. 1970; 25(3):339-46. PMC: 472719. DOI: 10.1136/thx.25.3.339. View

3.
Zorn 3rd G, Little S, Tadros P, Deeb G, Gleason T, Heiser J . Prosthesis-patient mismatch in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis: A randomized trial of a self-expanding prosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015; 151(4):1014-22, 1023.e1-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.10.070. View

4.
Sa M, Carvalho M, Sobral Filho D, Cavalcanti L, Diniz R, Rayol S . Impact of surgical aortic root enlargement on the outcomes of aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of 13 174 patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2019; 29(1):74-82. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivy364. View

5.
Rahimtoola S . The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation. 1978; 58(1):20-4. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.58.1.20. View