» Articles » PMID: 37754591

School-Level Socioeconomic Status and Nutrient Content of Outdoor Food/Beverage Advertisements

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37754591
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined if areas around schools with more students of lower socioeconomic status (SES) have more total food/beverage advertisements and/or more advertisements with poorer nutritional content as compared to areas around schools with fewer students with lower SES. All outdoor food/beverage advertisements within a half-mile radius of 47 middle and high schools in the United States were objectively documented in 2012 and coded for nutritional content. The total number of advertisements and the macronutrient and micronutrient contents (total calories, fat (g), protein (g), carbohydrate (g), sugar (g), and sodium (mg)) of food and beverage items depicted in the advertisements were calculated. In total, 9132 unique advertisements were recorded, with 3153 ads displaying food and beverages that could be coded for nutrient content. Schools located in areas of lower SES (≥60% students receiving free/reduced-price lunch) had significantly more advertisements displaying food and beverages that could be coded for nutrient content (z = 2.01, = 0.04), as well as advertisements that contained more sodium (z = 2.20, = 0.03), as compared to schools located in areas of higher SES. There were no differences in calorie, fat, protein, carbohydrate, or sugar content. Policies to reduce the prevalence of outdoor food and beverage advertising are warranted.

Citing Articles

Comparing the number of outdoor sugar-sweetened beverage and caffeinated beverage advertisements near schools by school type and school-level economic advantage.

Ruggles P, Pasch K, Poulos N, Thomas J PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0302048.

PMID: 38781217 PMC: 11115223. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302048.

References
1.
Kelly B, Cretikos M, Rogers K, King L . The commercial food landscape: outdoor food advertising around primary schools in Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008; 32(6):522-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00303.x. View

2.
Signal L, Stanley J, Smith M, Barr M, Chambers T, Zhou J . Children's everyday exposure to food marketing: an objective analysis using wearable cameras. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):137. PMC: 5632829. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0570-3. View

3.
Trapp G, Hooper P, Thornton L, Kennington K, Sartori A, Wickens N . Children's exposure to outdoor food advertising near primary and secondary schools in Australia. Health Promot J Austr. 2021; 33(3):642-648. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.532. View

4.
Toumpakari Z, Tilling K, Haase A, Johnson L . High-risk environments for eating foods surplus to requirements: a multilevel analysis of adolescents' non-core food intake in the National Diet and Nutrition Survey (NDNS). Public Health Nutr. 2018; 22(1):74-84. PMC: 10260551. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980018002860. View

5.
Hillier A, Cole B, Smith T, Yancey A, Williams J, Grier S . Clustering of unhealthy outdoor advertisements around child-serving institutions: a comparison of three cities. Health Place. 2009; 15(4):935-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2009.02.014. View