» Articles » PMID: 37754552

Investigating the Cecal Microbiota of Broilers Raised in Extensive and Intensive Production Systems

Overview
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37754552
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intensive broiler production practices are structured to prevent the introduction and spread of pathogens; however, they can potentially minimize the exposure of broilers to beneficial commensal bacteria. In this study, we used 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing to characterize the cecal microbiota of 35-day-old broilers from 22 independent commercial farms rearing broilers under intensive (IPS) or extensive production systems (EPS). We aimed to determine which bacteria are normal inhabitants of the broiler ceca and which bacteria might be missing from broilers in IPS. In addition, we generated a collection of 410 bacterial isolates, including 87 different species, to be used as a resource to further explore the effects of selected isolates on bird physiology and to elucidate the role of individual species within the cecal microbial community. Our results indicated significant differences in the microbiota of broilers between systems: the microbiota of broilers from EPS was dominated by Bacteroidetes {55.2% ± 8.9 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)]}, whereas Firmicutes dominated the microbiota of broilers from IPS (61.7% ± 14.4, mean ± SD). Bacterial taxa found to be core in the EPS microbiota, including , , , , , , and , were shown to be infrequent or absent from the IPS microbiota, and the EPS microbiota presented higher phylogenetic diversity and greater predicted functional potential than that of broilers in IPS. The bacteria shown to be depleted in broilers from IPS should be further investigated for their effects on bird physiology and potential application as next-generation probiotics. IMPORTANCE Production practices in intensive farming systems significantly reduce the introduction and spread of pathogens; however, they may potentially minimize the exposure of animals to beneficial commensal microorganisms. In this study, we identified core bacteria from the cecal microbiota of broilers raised in extensive production systems that are missing or reduced in birds from intensive systems, including , , , , , , and . Furthermore, the cecal microbiota of broilers from extensive systems showed higher diversity and greater functional potential than that of broilers from intensive systems. In addition, a collection of bacterial isolates containing 87 different species was generated from the current study, and this important resource can be used to further explore the role of selected commensal bacteria on the microbial community and bird physiology.

Citing Articles

In Vitro Insights into Bacteriocin-Mediated Modulation of Chicken Cecal Microbiota.

Mamjoud A, Zirah S, Biron E, Fliss O, Fliss I Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(2).

PMID: 39859483 PMC: 11765717. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26020755.


Macro, Trace and Toxic Element Composition in Liver and Meat of Broiler Chicken Associated with Cecal Microbiome Community.

Deryabin D, Kosyan D, Vlasenko L, Lazebnik C, Zatevalov A, Karimov I Biology (Basel). 2025; 13(12.

PMID: 39765642 PMC: 11672959. DOI: 10.3390/biology13120975.


In ovo sodium butyrate administration differentially impacts growth performance, intestinal barrier function, immune response, and gut microbiota characteristics in low and high hatch-weight broilers.

Akram M, Everaert N, Dunislawska A J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024; 15(1):165.

PMID: 39643908 PMC: 11624594. DOI: 10.1186/s40104-024-01122-4.


A comparison of wild boar and domestic pig microbiota does not reveal a loss of microbial species but an increase in alpha diversity and opportunistic genera in domestic pigs.

Rahman R, Fouhse J, Ju T, Fan Y, S Marcolla C, Pieper R Microbiol Spectr. 2024; 12(10):e0084324.

PMID: 39162552 PMC: 11448168. DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00843-24.


Broiler Chicken Cecal Microbiome and Poultry Farming Productivity: A Meta-Analysis.

Deryabin D, Lazebnik C, Vlasenko L, Karimov I, Kosyan D, Zatevalov A Microorganisms. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38674691 PMC: 11052200. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12040747.

References
1.
Forder R, Howarth G, Tivey D, Hughes R . Bacterial modulation of small intestinal goblet cells and mucin composition during early posthatch development of poultry. Poult Sci. 2007; 86(11):2396-403. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00222. View

2.
Douglas G, Maffei V, Zaneveld J, Yurgel S, Brown J, Taylor C . PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol. 2020; 38(6):685-688. PMC: 7365738. DOI: 10.1038/s41587-020-0548-6. View

3.
Farkas V, Csitari G, Menyhart L, Such N, Pal L, Husveth F . Microbiota Composition of Mucosa and Interactions between the Microbes of the Different Gut Segments Could Be a Factor to Modulate the Growth Rate of Broiler Chickens. Animals (Basel). 2022; 12(10). PMC: 9137591. DOI: 10.3390/ani12101296. View

4.
Jha R, Das R, Oak S, Mishra P . Probiotics (Direct-Fed Microbials) in Poultry Nutrition and Their Effects on Nutrient Utilization, Growth and Laying Performance, and Gut Health: A Systematic Review. Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(10). PMC: 7602066. DOI: 10.3390/ani10101863. View

5.
Louca S, Doebeli M . Efficient comparative phylogenetics on large trees. Bioinformatics. 2017; 34(6):1053-1055. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx701. View