» Articles » PMID: 37754489

An Overview of Endometrial Cancer with Novel Therapeutic Strategies

Overview
Journal Curr Oncol
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 27
PMID 37754489
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Endometrial cancer (EC) stands as the most prevalent gynecologic malignancy. In the past, it was classified based on its hormone sensitivity. However, The Cancer Genome Atlas has categorized EC into four groups, which offers a more objective and reproducible classification and has been shown to have prognostic and therapeutic implications. Hormonally driven EC arises from a precursor lesion known as endometrial hyperplasia, resulting from unopposed estrogen. EC is usually diagnosed through biopsy, followed by surgical staging unless advanced disease is expected. The typical staging consists of a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsies, with a preference placed on a minimally invasive approach. The stage of the disease is the most significant prognostic marker. However, factors such as age, histology, grade, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, tumor size, peritoneal cytology, hormone receptor status, ploidy and markers, body mass index, and the therapy received all contribute to the prognosis. Treatment is tailored based on the stage and the risk of recurrence. Radiotherapy is primarily used in the early stages, and chemotherapy can be added if high-grade histology or advanced-stage disease is present. The risk of EC recurrence increases with advances in stage. Among the recurrences, vaginal cases exhibit the most favorable response to treatment, typically for radiotherapy. Conversely, the treatment of widespread recurrence is currently palliative and is best managed with chemotherapy or hormonal agents. Most recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a promising treatment for advanced and recurrent EC.

Citing Articles

Comprehensive Review of Endometrial Cancer: New Molecular and FIGO Classification and Recent Treatment Changes.

Anca-Stanciu M, Manu A, Olinca M, Coroleuca C, Comandasu D, Coroleuca C J Clin Med. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 40004914 PMC: 11856752. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14041385.


FBXW7 Directly Ubiquitinates and Degrades CTNNB1 Mediating the Suppression of ENKUR in Endometrial Cancer.

Liu Y, Wang Q, Guo Q, Zhu Y, Lin L, Yang C Int J Biol Sci. 2025; 21(4):1801-1818.

PMID: 39990660 PMC: 11844281. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.104067.


Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF1) and Its Isoforms: Insights into the Mechanisms of Endometrial Cancer.

Hafizz A, Mohd Mokthar N, Md Zin R, Mongan N, Mamat Yusof M, Kampan N Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(1.

PMID: 39796756 PMC: 11720045. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17010129.


Artificial intelligence-assisted magnetic resonance imaging technology in the differential diagnosis and prognosis prediction of endometrial cancer.

Qi X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26878.

PMID: 39506051 PMC: 11541869. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-78081-3.


Clinicopathological characteristics of endometrial carcinoma with different molecular subtypes and their correlation with lymph node metastasis.

Meng Y, Feng J, Yang J, Yin H Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(8):3994-4003.

PMID: 39267670 PMC: 11387856. DOI: 10.62347/FPUJ8382.


References
1.
Kurman R, Kaminski P, NORRIS H . The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer. 1985; 56(2):403-12. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850715)56:2<403::aid-cncr2820560233>3.0.co;2-x. View

2.
Simpson A, Feigenberg T, Clarke B, Gien L, Ismiil N, Laframboise S . Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 133(2):229-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.02.020. View

3.
Qu X, Velker V, Leung E, Kwon J, Elshaikh M, Kong I . The role of adjuvant therapy in stage IA serous and clear cell uterine cancer: A multi-institutional pooled analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2018; 149(2):283-290. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.03.002. View

4.
Kwon J, Mazgani M, Miller D, Ehlen T, Heywood M, McAlpine J . The significance of surgical staging in intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2011; 122(1):50-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.02.037. View

5.
Takeshima N, Nishida H, Tabata T, Hirai Y, Hasumi K . Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: enhancement of other prognostic indicators. Gynecol Oncol. 2001; 82(3):470-3. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6301. View