» Articles » PMID: 37752304

Directed Retreat and Navigational Mechanisms in Trail Following Formica Obscuripes

Overview
Journal Learn Behav
Publisher Springer
Date 2023 Sep 26
PMID 37752304
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ant species exhibit behavioural commonalities when solving navigational challenges for successful orientation and to reach goal locations. These behaviours rely on a shared toolbox of navigational strategies that guide individuals under an array of motivational contexts. The mechanisms that support these behaviours, however, are tuned to each species' habitat and ecology with some exhibiting unique navigational behaviours. This leads to clear differences in how ant navigators rely on this shared toolbox to reach goals. Species with hybrid foraging structures, which navigate partially upon a pheromone-marked column, express distinct differences in their toolbox, compared to solitary foragers. Here, we explore the navigational abilities of the Western Thatching ant (Formica obscuripes), a hybrid foraging species whose navigational mechanisms have not been studied. We characterise their reliance on both the visual panorama and a path integrator for orientation, with the pheromone's presence acting as a non-directional reassurance cue, promoting continued orientation based on other strategies. This species also displays backtracking behaviour, which occurs with a combination of unfamiliar terrestrial cues and the absence of the pheromone, thus operating based upon a combination of the individual mechanisms observed in solitarily and socially foraging species. We also characterise a new form of goalless orientation in these ants, an initial retreating behaviour that is modulated by the forager's path integration system. The behaviour directs disturbed inbound foragers back along their outbound path for a short distance before recovering and reorienting back to the nest.

Citing Articles

Acute exposure to caffeine improves foraging in an invasive ant.

Galante H, De Agro M, Koch A, Kau S, Czaczkes T iScience. 2024; 27(6):109935.

PMID: 39055608 PMC: 11270030. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109935.


Route retracing: way pointing and multiple vector memories in trail-following ants.

Freas C, Spetch M J Exp Biol. 2023; 227(2).

PMID: 38126715 PMC: 10906666. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.246695.

References
1.
Islam M, Deeti S, Kamhi J, Cheng K . Minding the gap: learning and visual scanning behaviour in nocturnal bull ants. J Exp Biol. 2021; 224(14). PMC: 8325935. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.242245. View

2.
Wystrach A, Beugnon G, Cheng K . Landmarks or panoramas: what do navigating ants attend to for guidance?. Front Zool. 2011; 8:21. PMC: 3177867. DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-8-21. View

3.
Wystrach A, Schwarz S, Schultheiss P, Baniel A, Cheng K . Multiple sources of celestial compass information in the Central Australian desert ant Melophorus bagoti. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2014; 200(6):591-601. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-014-0899-x. View

4.
Schwarz S, Mangan M, Webb B, Wystrach A . Route-following ants respond to alterations of the view sequence. J Exp Biol. 2020; 223(Pt 14). DOI: 10.1242/jeb.218701. View

5.
Buehlmann C, Mangan M, Graham P . Multimodal interactions in insect navigation. Anim Cogn. 2020; 23(6):1129-1141. PMC: 7700066. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-020-01383-2. View