» Articles » PMID: 37752277

Difference in the Electromyographic Behavior of the Masticatory and Swallowing Muscles During Cued Versus Spontaneous Swallowing

Overview
Journal Dysphagia
Date 2023 Sep 26
PMID 37752277
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The risk of dysphagia and/or aspiration is determined using screening tests, such as the repeated saliva swallowing test and modified water swallowing test, which evaluate cued swallowing. However, humans masticate and swallow foods with various consistencies, forms, and amounts, without conscious awareness. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the difference in the behavior of masticatory and swallowing muscles during spontaneous versus cued swallowing through a series of mastication and swallowing processes by evaluating surface electromyogram (sEMG) signals. The effect of the consistency and amount of food on the behavior of these muscles was also investigated. The sEMG recordings of the masseter muscles and anterior belly of the digastric muscle for 12 subjects, and genioglossus muscle for 5 subjects were obtained. The genioglossus activity was recorded using custom-made ball electrodes. The test foods were cookies and tofu, in amounts of 2 g and 4 g. The normalized muscle activity (integrated EMG), duration of the muscle activity, initial activation timepoint of each muscle, and total duration of swallowing were compared among four conditions. The activity of each muscle was significantly higher during the swallowing of cookies than tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for cued versus spontaneous swallowing. The duration of each muscle activity, initial activation timepoint, and total duration of swallowing were significantly longer for cookies versus tofu, for 4 g vs 2 g, and for spontaneous versus cued swallowing. These results suggest that the behavior of the masticatory and swallowing muscles is affected by cued swallowing and by the consistency and amount of food.

Citing Articles

Advancements and Challenges in Non-Invasive Sensor Technologies for Swallowing Assessment: A Review.

Wu Y, Guo K, Chu Y, Wang Z, Yang H, Zhang J Bioengineering (Basel). 2024; 11(5).

PMID: 38790297 PMC: 11118896. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11050430.

References
1.
Huckabee M, Butler S, Barclay M, Jit S . Submental surface electromyographic measurement and pharyngeal pressures during normal and effortful swallowing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86(11):2144-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.05.005. View

2.
Palmer P, Luschei E, Jaffe D, McCulloch T . Contributions of individual muscles to the submental surface electromyogram during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999; 42(6):1378-91. DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1378. View

3.
Okada T, Aoyagi Y, Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Kagaya H, Shibata S . Dynamic change in hyoid muscle length associated with trajectory of hyoid bone during swallowing: analysis using 320-row area detector computed tomography. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013; 115(8):1138-45. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00467.2013. View

4.
Vaiman M, Eviatar E, Segal S . Surface electromyographic studies of swallowing in normal subjects: a review of 440 adults. Report 1. Quantitative data: timing measures. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 131(4):548-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.013. View

5.
Palmer J, Tanaka E, SIEBENS A . Electromyography of the pharyngeal musculature: technical considerations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 70(4):283-7. View