» Articles » PMID: 37750169

Specificity of Cancer-related Chromosomal Translocations is Linked to Proximity After the DNA Double-strand Break and Subsequent Selection

Overview
Journal NAR Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2023 Sep 26
PMID 37750169
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Most cancer-related chromosomal translocations appear to be cell type specific. It is currently unknown why different chromosomal translocations occur in different cells. This can be due to either the occurrence of particular translocations in specific cell types or adaptive survival advantage conferred by translocations only in specific cells. We experimentally addressed this question by double-strand break (DSB) induction at , ,  and  loci in the same cell to generate chromosomal translocations in different cell lineages. Our results show that any translocation can potentially arise in any cell type. We have analyzed different factors that could affect the frequency of the translocations, and only the spatial proximity between gene loci after the DSB induction correlated with the resulting translocation frequency, supporting the 'breakage-first' model. Furthermore, upon long-term culture of cells with the generated chromosomal translocations, only oncogenic - and - translocations persisted over a 60-day period. Overall, the results suggest that chromosomal translocation can be generated after DSB induction in any type of cell, but whether the cell with the translocation would persist in a cell population depends on the cell type-specific selective survival advantage that the chromosomal translocation confers to the cell.

Citing Articles

From Genes to Clinical Practice: Exploring the Genomic Underpinnings of Endometrial Cancer.

Molefi T, Mabonga L, Hull R, Sebitloane M, Dlamini Z Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858102 PMC: 11763595. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020320.

References
1.
Mine-Hattab J, Rothstein R . Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat Cell Biol. 2012; 14(5):510-7. DOI: 10.1038/ncb2472. View

2.
Vanoli F, Tomishima M, Feng W, Lamribet K, Babin L, Brunet E . CRISPR-Cas9-guided oncogenic chromosomal translocations with conditional fusion protein expression in human mesenchymal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017; 114(14):3696-3701. PMC: 5389291. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700622114. View

3.
Canoy R, Shmakova A, Karpukhina A, Shepelev M, Germini D, Vassetzky Y . Factors That Affect the Formation of Chromosomal Translocations in Cells. Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(20). PMC: 9600575. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205110. View

4.
Aten J, Stap J, Krawczyk P, van Oven C, Hoebe R, Essers J . Dynamics of DNA double-strand breaks revealed by clustering of damaged chromosome domains. Science. 2004; 303(5654):92-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.1088845. View

5.
Lukasova E, Kozubek S, Kozubek M, Kjeronska J, Ryznar L, Horakova J . Localisation and distance between ABL and BCR genes in interphase nuclei of bone marrow cells of control donors and patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia. Hum Genet. 1997; 100(5-6):525-35. DOI: 10.1007/s004390050547. View