» Articles » PMID: 37749312

Motivation Moderates Gender Differences in Navigation Performance

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 Sep 25
PMID 37749312
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gender differences in navigation performance are a recurrent and controversial topic. Previous research suggests that men outperform women in navigation tasks and that men and women exhibit different navigation strategies. Here, we investigate whether motivation to complete the task moderates the relationship between navigation performance and gender. Participants learned the locations of landmarks in a novel virtual city. During learning, participants could trigger a top-down map that depicted their current position and the locations of the landmarks. During testing, participants were divided into control and treatment groups and were not allowed to consult the map. All participants were given 16 minutes to navigate to the landmarks, but those in the treatment group were monetarily penalized for every second they spent completing the task. Results revealed a negative relationship between physiological arousal and the time required to locate the landmarks. In addition, gender differences in strategy were found during learning, with women spending more time with the map and taking 40% longer than men to locate the landmarks. Interestingly, an interaction between gender and treatment group revealed that women in the control group required more time than men and women in the treatment group to retrieve the landmarks. During testing, women in the control group also took more circuitous routes compared to men in the control group and women in the treatment group. These results suggest that a concurrent and relevant stressor can motivate women to perform similarly to men, helping to diminish pervasive gender differences found in the navigation literature.

Citing Articles

Subjective spatial orientation discomfort is associated with decreased real-world spatial performance and lower cognitive function.

Gerb J, Oertle V, Becker-Bense S, Brandt T, Dieterich M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1481653.

PMID: 39605790 PMC: 11599218. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1481653.


Unreliable association between self-reported sense of direction and peripheral vestibular function.

Gerb J, Brandt T, Dieterich M Brain Behav. 2024; 14(9):e70000.

PMID: 39245964 PMC: 11381552. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70000.


Stress affects navigation strategies in immersive virtual reality.

Varshney A, Munns M, Kasowski J, Zhou M, He C, Grafton S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):5949.

PMID: 38467699 PMC: 10928118. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56048-8.


Shorter self-reported sleep duration is associated with worse virtual spatial navigation performance in men.

Yavuz E, Gahnstrom C, Goodroe S, Coutrot A, Hornberger M, Lazar A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4093.

PMID: 38374314 PMC: 10876962. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52662-8.


The role of strategic visibility in shaping wayfinding behavior in multilevel buildings.

Gath-Morad M, Grubel J, Steemers K, Sailer K, Ben-Alon L, Holscher C Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):3735.

PMID: 38355942 PMC: 10866884. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-53420-6.

References
1.
Shields G, Sazma M, McCullough A, Yonelinas A . The effects of acute stress on episodic memory: A meta-analysis and integrative review. Psychol Bull. 2017; 143(6):636-675. PMC: 5436944. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000100. View

2.
Brown T, Gagnon S, Wagner A . Stress Disrupts Human Hippocampal-Prefrontal Function during Prospective Spatial Navigation and Hinders Flexible Behavior. Curr Biol. 2020; 30(10):1821-1833.e8. PMC: 7331937. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.03.006. View

3.
Mair P, Wilcox R . Robust statistical methods in R using the WRS2 package. Behav Res Methods. 2019; 52(2):464-488. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-019-01246-w. View

4.
Carsten T, Kostandyan M, Boehler C, Krebs R . Comparing the motivational value of rewards and losses in an EEG-pupillometry study. Eur J Neurosci. 2020; 53(6):1822-1838. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15064. View

5.
van den Berg B, Krebs R, Lorist M, Woldorff M . Utilization of reward-prospect enhances preparatory attention and reduces stimulus conflict. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2014; 14(2):561-77. PMC: 4412026. DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0281-z. View