» Articles » PMID: 37748692

Brief Report: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Lung Cancers That Inhibit MATE-1 Can Lead to "False" Decreases in Renal Function

Overview
Journal J Thorac Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2023 Sep 25
PMID 37748692
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Select tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat oncogene-driven lung cancers also inhibit MATE-1. When MATE-1 is blocked, creatinine is retained in the serum. Elevated creatinine levels raise the specter of drug-induced intrarenal insufficiency despite the lack of true renal injury. We conducted a systematic analysis of MATE-1 inhibitor (MATEi)-treated patients to comprehensively characterize this phenomenon.

Methods: Patients with oncogene-driven lung cancer treated with a wide variety of MATEi TKIs (brigatinib, cabozantinib, capmatinib, crizotinib, entrectinib, lorlatinib, pralsetinib, selpercatinib, and tepotinib) were eligible for an analysis of renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was classified on the basis of creatinine levels (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria) as stage 1 (≥1.5× but <2× baseline), stage 2 (≥2× but <3× baseline), or stage 3 (>3× baseline). When available, cystatin C, a marker of kidney function unaffected by MATE-1, was used to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Results: We identified 863 patients receiving MATEi TKIs including crizotinib (39%, n = 333), lorlatinib (17%, n = 144), cabozantinib (10%, n = 87), selpercatinib (10%, n = 82), capmatinib (9%, n = 77), brigatinib (6%, n = 53), entrectinib (5%, n = 45), tepotinib (5%, n = 41), and pralsetinib (0.1%, n = 1). Of the 90 patients (10%) with acute kidney injury, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 1, 2, and 3 were observed in 72% (n = 65), 21% (n = 19), and 7% (n = 6) of patients, respectively. Concurrently drawn creatinine and cystatin C levels on TKI therapy were available for 17 patients. In most cases (n = 15 of 17), the calculated GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine. The percentage of patients whose GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine by less than 10 mL/min, 10 to 19 mL/min, 20 to 29 mL/min, and more than or equal to 30 mL/min was 27% (n = four of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), and 33% (n = five of 15), respectively. Long-term data in three patients that spanned 3 years revealed that GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine in 96% (n = 49 of 51) of all time points. Using a virtual clinical trial GFR cutoff of 40 mL/min, the percentage of eligible patients rose from 41% (n = seven of 17) using creatinine calculations to 71% (n = 12 of 17) using cystatin C calculations.

Conclusions: The calculated GFR in patients with cancer receiving MATEi TKIs was higher in almost all cases when using cystatin C. When serum creatinine level seems elevated in patients receiving MATE-1 inhibitors, we recommend recalculating GFR using cystatin C before searching for other etiologies of kidney injury and reducing or stopping TKI therapy.

Citing Articles

Pseudo acute kidney injury in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors.

Buijs S, Jongbloed E, van Bergen L, Ramakers C, Koolen S, Mathijssen R Br J Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 39930149 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-025-02951-4.


Risk of and Mortality After Acute Kidney Injury Following Cancer Treatment: A Cohort Study.

Munch P, Norgaard M, Jensen S, Birn H, Schmidt H, Christiansen C Cancer Med. 2025; 14(3):e70646.

PMID: 39927749 PMC: 11808929. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70646.


Assessment of GFR in Patients with Cancer Part 2: Anticancer Therapies-Perspectives from the American Society of Onco-Nephrology (ASON).

Kitchlu A, Costa E Silva V, Anand S, Kala J, Abudayyeh A, Inker L Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024; 19(8):1073-1077.

PMID: 39316409 PMC: 11321741. DOI: 10.2215/CJN.0000000000000509.


Nephrotoxicity of targeted therapy used to treat lung cancer.

Li Q, Lin J, Hao G, Xie A, Liu S, Tang B Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1369118.

PMID: 39026680 PMC: 11254629. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1369118.


RET Inhibitors in RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers: Past, Present, and Future.

Chen M, Repetto M, Wilhelm C, Drilon A Drugs. 2024; 84(9):1035-1053.

PMID: 38997570 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02040-5.

References
1.
Shaw A, Bauer T, de Marinis F, Felip E, Goto Y, Liu G . First-Line Lorlatinib or Crizotinib in Advanced -Positive Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383(21):2018-2029. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2027187. View

2.
Choueiri T, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring P, Rini B, Donskov F . Cabozantinib versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015; 373(19):1814-23. PMC: 5024539. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016. View

3.
Park K, Tan E, OByrne K, Zhang L, Boyer M, Mok T . Afatinib versus gefitinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (LUX-Lung 7): a phase 2B, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17(5):577-89. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30033-X. View

4.
Costa E Silva V, Gil Jr L, Inker L, Caires R, Costalonga E, Coura-Filho G . A prospective cross-sectional study estimated glomerular filtration rate from creatinine and cystatin C in adults with solid tumors. Kidney Int. 2022; 101(3):607-614. DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.12.010. View

5.
Khwaja A . KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012; 120(4):c179-84. DOI: 10.1159/000339789. View