» Articles » PMID: 37747629

Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Bevacizumab-awwb Biosimilar Versus Bevacizumab Reference Product in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Journal BioDrugs
Date 2023 Sep 25
PMID 37747629
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab-awwb was the first biosimilar approved for cancer treatment in the USA. Limited information is available on the real-world comparative safety and effectiveness of bevacizumab biosimilars, especially for indications granted approval through extrapolation.

Objective: To evaluate the real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) initiated on bevacizumab-awwb versus bevacizumab reference product.

Patients And Methods: This was an observational, longitudinal cohort study of US adult patients with mCRC from four integrated care delivery systems who were newly initiated on bevacizumab-awwb between 1 July 2019 and 30 March 2020 or bevacizumab reference product between 1 July 2015 and 30 June 2018. Patients were followed until 1 year after treatment initiation, end of plan membership, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary outcome of overall survival (OS) was analyzed using a binary non-inferiority test with lower margin of 10% and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analysis to assess all-cause mortality if non-inferiority was met. Secondary outcomes included counts of doses received, treatment duration, all-cause hospitalizations, and incidence of serious adverse events.

Results: A total of 1445 patients initiated on either bevacizumab-awwb (n = 239) or bevacizumab reference product (n = 1206) were included in the analysis. The mean overall age was 60 ± 13 years, 46% of patients were female, and 51% were white. The OS rate was 72.8% and 73.1% for patients receiving bevacizumab-awwb and bevacizumab reference product, respectively (p < 0.01 for non-inferiority). The adjusted hazard ratio for mortality was 1.01 (0.77-1.33, p = 0.93). There were no statistically significant differences in secondary outcomes between the study groups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that bevacizumab-awwb is as effective and safe as bevacizumab reference product for the real-world treatment of mCRC.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Efficacy, Safety, and Economic Outcomes Between Biosimilar ABP 215 and Originator Bevacizumab in Japanese Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Sumimoto T, Tanaka R, Tatsuta R, Kubota M, Itoh H Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72260.

PMID: 39583480 PMC: 11584936. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72260.


Eribulin versus S-1 as first or second-line chemotherapy to assess health-related quality of life and overall survival in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (RESQ study): a non-inferiority, randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Takahashi M, Kikawa Y, Kashiwabara K, Taira N, Iwatani T, Shimozuma K EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 74:102715.

PMID: 39109189 PMC: 11301378. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102715.


Real-world outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated first line with a bevacizumab biosimilar (bevacizumab-awwb).

Jin R, Ogbomo A, Accortt N, Lal L, Bishi G, Sandschafer D Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023; 15:17588359231182386.

PMID: 37360769 PMC: 10288425. DOI: 10.1177/17588359231182386.

References
1.
Shankaran V, Unger J, Darke A, Suga J, Wade J, Kourlas P . S1417CD: A Prospective Multicenter Cooperative Group-Led Study of Financial Hardship in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2022; 114(3):372-380. PMC: 8902339. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab210. View

2.
Leighl N, Nirmalakumar S, Ezeife D, Gyawali B . An Arm and a Leg: The Rising Cost of Cancer Drugs and Impact on Access. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2021; 41:1-12. DOI: 10.1200/EDBK_100028. View

3.
Abrams H, Durbin S, Huang C, Johnson S, Nayak R, Zahner G . Financial toxicity in cancer care: origins, impact, and solutions. Transl Behav Med. 2021; 11(11):2043-2054. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab091. View

4.
Al-Ziftawi N, Shafie A, Ibrahim M . Cost-effectiveness analyses of breast cancer medications use in developing countries: a systematic review. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020; 21(4):655-666. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2020.1794826. View

5.
Chopra R, Lopes G . Improving Access to Cancer Treatments: The Role of Biosimilars. J Glob Oncol. 2017; 3(5):596-610. PMC: 5646904. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.2016.008607. View