» Articles » PMID: 37745692

Application of an Endodontic Static Guide in Fiber Post Removal from a Compromised Tooth

Overview
Journal Case Rep Dent
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Sep 25
PMID 37745692
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Removing a fiber post from a root canal that requires endodontic retreatment is often very challenging. Conventional freehand techniques for removing fiber posts are time-consuming, sometimes result in iatrogenic errors, and heavily rely on the practitioner's experience. The endodontic static guide can be an alternative method. While the use of an endodontic 3D-printed static guide for fiber post removal has been reported as highly successful, it can also cause complications. Skipping any critical steps during the guide construction or its clinical application can lead to errors. This case report presents the saving of a compromised tooth with a fractured fiber post and a periapical lesion around the apex through the use of an endodontic static guide for fiber post removal. This study describes possible sources of error that may happen during construction and clinical use of the guide.

Citing Articles

An Innovative Approach for Retrieval of a Separated Intracanal File Using Guided Endodontics: A Case Report.

Gupta S, Sharma A, Jaiswal S, Koul R, Tyagi S Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77393.

PMID: 39949425 PMC: 11821464. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77393.


Innovative Endodontic Management of Pulp Canal Obliteration in Mandibular Incisors Using a Static Navigation System: A Case Report.

MahjourianQomi R, Aminsobhani M, Assadian H, Adnaninia S Clin Case Rep. 2024; 12(11):e9596.

PMID: 39568536 PMC: 11578672. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.9596.


Accuracy comparison of single- and double-sleeve endodontic guides for fiber post removal.

Dianat O, Naseri M, Safi Y, Modaberi A, Zargar N, Peters O BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):497.

PMID: 38678244 PMC: 11055251. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04283-w.


Removal of fiber posts using conventional versus guided endodontics: a comparative study of dentin loss and complications.

Krug R, Schwarz F, Dullin C, Leontiev W, Connert T, Krastl G Clin Oral Investig. 2024; 28(3):192.

PMID: 38438798 PMC: 10912265. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-024-05577-7.

References
1.
Mo S, Xu Y, Zhang L, Cao Y, Zhou Y, Xu X . Accuracy of a 3D printed sleeveless guide system used for fiber post removal: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2022; 128:104367. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104367. View

2.
Moreno-Rabie C, Torres A, Lambrechts P, Jacobs R . Clinical applications, accuracy and limitations of guided endodontics: a systematic review. Int Endod J. 2019; 53(2):214-231. DOI: 10.1111/iej.13216. View

3.
Ali A, Arslan H . Effectiveness of the static-guided endodontic technique for accessing the root canal through MTA and its effect on fracture strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2020; 25(4):1989-1995. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-020-03507-x. View

4.
Buchgreitz J, Buchgreitz M, Mortensen D, Bjorndal L . Guided access cavity preparation using cone-beam computed tomography and optical surface scans - an ex vivo study. Int Endod J. 2015; 49(8):790-5. DOI: 10.1111/iej.12516. View

5.
Schwartz R, Robbins J . Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod. 2004; 30(5):289-301. DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200405000-00001. View