» Articles » PMID: 37744592

The Dyadic Regulation Approach of Coping and Illness Representations in Female Cancer Patients and Their Partners

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2023 Sep 25
PMID 37744592
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Adjustment to any illness is a 'dyadic' process whereby patients and their partners mutually determine each other's perceptions, behaviours, and well-being. The present study explored the association between dyadic coping strategies and illness representations in newly diagnosed female cancer patients and their partners.

Methods: The sample consisted of 92 female cancer patient-partner pairs from 3 oncology hospitals in Greece and Cyprus. The Actor Partner Interdependence Model was applied to test for dyadic regulation effects.

Results: The findings revealed that patients' evaluations of dyadic coping were related to their own illness representations and, in some cases, to partners' illness representations of control. However, partner evaluations of dyadic coping were not associated with either patients' or their own illness representations. Relationship satisfaction did not moderate the relationship between dyadic coping and illness representations.

Implications: The study suggests that patients' perceptions of support provided by themselves and their partners play a significant role in shaping their illness representations. Future research could delve into the underlying reasons for the observed differences in the impact of dyadic coping on illness representations between patients and partners, considering factors such as gender roles and specific gender-related issues.

Citing Articles

Illness perception and intimate relationships in patients with cervical cancer: the mediating role of dyadic coping.

Yang Z, Lai Y, Xiong C, Chen J, Guo Z, Guan S Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(8):557.

PMID: 39080050 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08762-2.

References
1.
Richardson E, Schuz N, Sanderson K, Scott J, Schuz B . Illness representations, coping, and illness outcomes in people with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2016; 26(6):724-737. DOI: 10.1002/pon.4213. View

2.
Karademas E, Dimitraki G, Thomadakis C, Giannousi Z . The relation of spouse illness representations to patient representations and coping behavior: A study in couples dealing with a newly diagnosed cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018; 37(2):145-159. DOI: 10.1080/07347332.2018.1508534. View

3.
Durazo A, Cameron L . Representations of cancer recurrence risk, recurrence worry, and health-protective behaviours: an elaborated, systematic review. Health Psychol Rev. 2019; 13(4):447-476. PMC: 6851428. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1618725. View

4.
Badr H, Carmack C, Kashy D, Cristofanilli M, Revenson T . Dyadic coping in metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychol. 2010; 29(2):169-80. PMC: 3138118. DOI: 10.1037/a0018165. View

5.
Karademas E . A new perspective on dyadic regulation in chronic illness: the dyadic regulation connectivity model. Health Psychol Rev. 2021; 16(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1874471. View