» Articles » PMID: 37740115

Adult Spinal Deformity Correction Surgery Using Age-adjusted Alignment Thresholds: Clinical Outcomes and Mechanical Complication Rates. A Systematic Review of the Literature

Overview
Journal Eur Spine J
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Sep 22
PMID 37740115
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery gives good clinical outcomes but has a high rate of mechanical complications (MC). In 2016, Lafage described the age-adjusted alignment thresholds (AAAT) to adapt the correction in relation to patient's age proposing less aggressive corrections for the elderly population. The aim of this review was to clarify the effectiveness of AAAT to achieve good health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and their relationship with post-operative MC.

Materials And Methods: We performed a review of the literature, including articles reporting data on post-operative HRQoL and MC rates in relation to the AAAT. Data were stratified according to whether they matched the AAAT, dividing the population in undercorrected (U), matched (M) and overcorrected (O). The quality of the included studies was assessed using the GRADE and MINORS systems.

Results: Six articles reporting data from 1,825 patients were included. The different categories (U, M and O) had homogeneous pre-operative sagittal parameters (p > 0.05) that became statistically different after surgeries (p < 0.05). Proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) was more frequent in the O group compared to U (p = 0.05). Post-operative HRQoL parameters were similar in the 3 groups (p > 0.05). The quality of the included studies was generally low with a high bias risk.

Conclusion: The results extrapolated from this review are interesting, as for the same HRQoL the U group had a lower MC rate. Unfortunately, the results are inconsistent, mainly because of the low quality of the included studies and the lack of reporting of some important patient- and surgery-related factors.

Citing Articles

Surgical Management of Adult Spinal Deformity Patients with Osteoporosis.

Baroudi M, Daher M, Maheshwari K, Singh M, Nassar J, McDonald C J Clin Med. 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39685632 PMC: 11641945. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13237173.


Patient-specific rods in adult spinal deformity: a systematic review.

Picton B, Stone L, Liang J, Solomon S, Brown N, Luzzi S Spine Deform. 2024; 12(3):577-585.

PMID: 38265734 PMC: 11068670. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00805-8.

References
1.
Fehlings M, Tetreault L, Nater A, Choma T, Harrop J, Mroz T . The Aging of the Global Population: The Changing Epidemiology of Disease and Spinal Disorders. Neurosurgery. 2015; 77 Suppl 4:S1-5. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000953. View

2.
Ames C, Scheer J, Lafage V, Smith J, Bess S, Berven S . Adult Spinal Deformity: Epidemiology, Health Impact, Evaluation, and Management. Spine Deform. 2016; 4(4):310-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.009. View

3.
Passias P, Horn S, Frangella N, Poorman G, Vasquez-Montes D, Diebo B . Full-Body Analysis of Adult Spinal Deformity Patients' Age-Adjusted Alignment at 1 Year. World Neurosurg. 2018; 114:e775-e784. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.079. View

4.
Kim Y, Bridwell K, Lenke L, Glattes C, Rhim S, Cheh G . Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(20):2179-84. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0428. View

5.
Smith J, Lafage V, Shaffrey C, Schwab F, Lafage R, Hostin R . Outcomes of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Matched Cohort Assessment With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Neurosurgery. 2015; 78(6):851-61. DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001116. View