Association Between Using a Prehospital Assessment Unit and Hospital Admission and Mortality: a Matched Cohort Study

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2023 Sep 22

PMID 37739475

Authors

Signe Amalie Wolthers

Stig Nikolaj Fasmer Blomberg

Niklas Breindahl

Sair Anjum

Daniel Hagi-Pedersen

Annette Ersboll

Lars Bredevang Andersen

Helle Collatz Christensen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to compare hospital admission and 30-day mortality between patients assessed by the prehospital assessment unit (PAU) and patients not assessed by the PAU.

Design: This was a matched cohort study.

Setting: This study was conducted between November 2021 and October 2022 in Region Zealand, Denmark.

Participants: 989 patients aged >18, assessed by the PAU, were identified, and 9860 patients not assessed by the PAU were selected from the emergency calls using exposure density sampling.

Exposure: Patients assessed by the PAU. The PAU is operated by paramedics with access to point-of-care test facilities. The PAU is an alternative response vehicle without the capability of transporting patients.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was hospital admission within 48 hours after the initial call. The key secondary outcomes were admission within 7 days, 30-day mortality and admission within 6 hours. Descriptive statistical analyses were conducted, and logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted OR (aOR) and 95% CI.

Results: Among the PAU assessed, 44.1% were admitted within 48 hours, compared with 72.9% of the non-PAU assessed, p<0.001. The multivariable analysis showed a lower risk of admission within 48 hours and 7 days among the PAU patients, aOR 0.31 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.38) and aOR 0.50 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.64), respectively. The 30-day mortality rate was 3.8% in the PAU-assessed patients vs 5.5% in the non-PAU-assessed patients, p=0.03. In the multivariable analysis, no significant difference was found in mortality aOR 0.99 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.42). No deaths were observed in PAU-assessed patients without subsequent follow-up.

Conclusion: The recently introduced PAU aims for patient-centred emergency care. The PAU-assessed patients had reduced admissions within 48 hours and 7 days after the initial call. Study findings indicate that the PAU is safe since we identified no significant differences in 30-day mortality.

Trial Registration Number: NCT05654909.

Citing Articles

Is non-conveyance solo-ambulances a useful mean to meet the increasing demand for emergency medical services in Denmark?.

Moller F, Persson M, Engholm E, Jensen P, Vaeggemose U, Gehrt T BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):307.

PMID: 40001050 PMC: 11852878. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12448-8.

References

Patton A, ODonnell C, Keane O, Henry K, Crowley D, Collins A . The Alternative Pre-hospital Pathway team: reducing conveyances to the emergency department through patient centered Community Emergency Medicine. BMC Emerg Med. 2021; 21(1):138. PMC: 8601091. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-021-00536-x. View

DHoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C . Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996; 49(12):1429-33. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00271-5. View

Yeung T, Shannon B, Perillo S, Nehme Z, Jennings P, Olaussen A . Review article: Outcomes of patients who are not transported following ambulance attendance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Med Australas. 2019; 31(3):321-331. DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.13288. View

Mikkelsen S, Lassen A . The Danish prehospital system. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020; 27(6):394-395. DOI: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000774. View

Thurman W, Moczygemba L, Tormey K, Hudzik A, Welton-Arndt L, Okoh C . A scoping review of community paramedicine: evidence and implications for interprofessional practice. J Interprof Care. 2020; 35(2):229-239. DOI: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1732312. View

Textor J, van der Zander B, Gilthorpe M, Liskiewicz M, Ellison G . Robust causal inference using directed acyclic graphs: the R package 'dagitty'. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 45(6):1887-1894. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw341. View

Shah M . The formation of the emergency medical services system. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96(3):414-23. PMC: 1470509. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.048793. View

Paulin J, Kurola J, Salantera S, Moen H, Guragain N, Koivisto M . Changing role of EMS -analyses of non-conveyed and conveyed patients in Finland. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020; 28(1):45. PMC: 7260794. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-020-00741-w. View

Choi B, Blumberg C, Williams K . Mobile Integrated Health Care and Community Paramedicine: An Emerging Emergency Medical Services Concept. Ann Emerg Med. 2015; 67(3):361-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.005. View

10.

Dax F, Trentzsch H, Lazarovici M, Hegenberg K, Kneissl K, Hoffmann F . [Differences between emergency medical services operations with and without patient transport : A retrospective analysis of dispatch center data in a territorial state]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022; 65(10):996-1006. PMC: 9522751. DOI: 10.1007/s00103-022-03590-3. View

11.

Snooks H, Kingston M, Anthony R, Russell I . New models of emergency prehospital care that avoid unnecessary conveyance to emergency department: translation of research evidence into practice?. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:182102. PMC: 3684122. DOI: 10.1155/2013/182102. View

12.

Lynge E, Sandegaard J, Rebolj M . The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health. 2011; 39(7 Suppl):30-3. DOI: 10.1177/1403494811401482. View

13.

Mason S, Knowles E, Colwell B, Dixon S, Wardrope J, Gorringe R . Effectiveness of paramedic practitioners in attending 999 calls from elderly people in the community: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007; 335(7626):919. PMC: 2048868. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39343.649097.55. View

14.

Hanninen J, Kouvonen A, Sumanen H . Patients Seeking Retreatment after Community Paramedic Assessment and Treatment: Piloting a Community Paramedic Unit Program in Southwest Finland. Nurs Rep. 2021; 10(2):66-74. PMC: 8608090. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep10020010. View

15.

Christensen E, Dahl Bendtsen M, Larsen T, Jensen F, Lindskou T, Holdgaard H . Trends in diagnostic patterns and mortality in emergency ambulance service patients in 2007-2014: a population-based cohort study from the North Denmark Region. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(8):e014508. PMC: 5724206. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014508. View

16.

Magnusson C, Kallenius C, Knutsson S, Herlitz J, Axelsson C . Pre-hospital assessment by a single responder: The Swedish ambulance nurse in a new role: A pilot study. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015; 26:32-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ienj.2015.09.001. View

17.

Moller S, Bliddal M, Rubin K . Methodical considerations on adjusting for Charlson Comorbidity Index in epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2021; 36(11):1123-1128. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-021-00802-z. View

18.

Andersen M, Johnsen S, Sorensen J, Jepsen S, Hansen J, Christensen E . Implementing a nationwide criteria-based emergency medical dispatch system: a register-based follow-up study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2013; 21:53. PMC: 3708811. DOI: 10.1186/1757-7241-21-53. View

19.

Quan H, Li B, Couris C, Fushimi K, Graham P, Hider P . Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am J Epidemiol. 2011; 173(6):676-82. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq433. View

20.

Hoglund E, Andersson-Hagiwara M, Schroder A, Moller M, Ohlsson-Nevo E . Characteristics of non-conveyed patients in emergency medical services (EMS): a one-year prospective descriptive and comparative study in a region of Sweden. BMC Emerg Med. 2020; 20(1):61. PMC: 7418316. DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-00353-8. View